2011-07-13 Board of Ethics Minutes

Home

United States Code. Therefore, you have conspired with other individuals and agents of the county and state to instill upon me that you actually have the constitutional rights and authorities to deprive me or any person of their state and federal guaranteed rights and privileges. That is known as a violation of United States Code, Criminal Title 1542, sale into involuntary servitude, combined with the violations of 241 and 242, identify that you have committed violations of the 13 amendment against the person, where no person shall be held in slavery or involuntary servitude within the territories or states of the United States. Therefore, under Title 42 of the United States Code, I am able to file tort against you personally and severally outside of your official functions. I have a JS 44 form prepared for the U.S. District Court, District of Hawai‘i, on that matter at this time. It is understood that I have—the actions of this Board, should it go forth, I requested formal testimony where I may subpoena individuals and take sworn depositions and interrogatories. It is understood by my formal filing in this matter and in the court documents, I understand that my rights are to be anticipated to be deprived of me this day and that this board will somehow find a reason that they cannot proceed in these matters. So being said, you have been caveated. Thank you very much for your attention. MR. DILL: All right, thank you. Moving on to agenda item number 3. 3. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 8, 2011, MEETING (REGULAR SESSION) Mr. Heaukulani and Mr. Balsis both indicated they had no comments or corrections to make to the minutes. Motion and vote: Mr. Heaukulani moved to approve the minutes, Mr. Balsis seconded the motion, and they and Mr. Henricks voted aye. Mr. Dill recused himself. 4. NEW BUSINESS a. Petition No. 2011-08: Officer’s request for an informal advisory opinion on whether the officer may sit on a State of Hawai‘i board. Ms. Schoen stated that she spoke with the officer and his staff, and he was again not able to attend the meeting. At the Board’s June meeting, it was discussed whether or not the petition should be dismissed until such time that the officer is prepared and able to attend. He could at that time file a new petition. Mr. Henricks asked whether the officer was planning to go forward with the petition, and Ms. Schoen said she did not know. Motion and vote: Mr. Henricks moved to continue the petition, Mr. Balsis seconded the motion, and all members voted aye. 3