My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan: Plan Review Crosswalk
PublicDocuments
>
Civil Defense
>
Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010
>
Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan: Plan Review Crosswalk
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2011 8:11:04 AM
Creation date
8/11/2011 8:10:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7.Assessing Vulnerability: Overview <br /> Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii): [The risk assessment shall include a]description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph(c)(2)(i) <br /> of this section. This description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its impact on the community. <br /> Location in the SCORE <br /> Plan(section or N S <br /> Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments <br /> A. Does the updated plan document Chapter 1 Appendix A Chapter 1—Appendix A meets this requirement. <br /> how the planning team reviewed and <br /> analyzed each element in this section <br /> of the plan and whether any was <br /> revised as part of the update <br /> process? <br /> B. Does the new or updated plan Executive Summary The summary descriptions of vulnerability to each hazard are quite <br /> include an overall summary Chapter 18,Sections 18.1,18.2 varied in the detail;a few chapters indicate specific vulnerability to <br /> description of the jurisdiction's Chapter 18,Section 18.3.3 the hazard discussed;others have indications of vulnerability <br /> vulnerability to each hazard? scattered throughout the text.The plan would be much more"user <br /> friendly"if there were a consistent statement of vulnerability within <br /> each chapter. <br /> Recommended Revision: <br /> • Provide a statement/discussion/narrative for each hazard <br /> within the specific chapter that clearly states the County of <br /> Hawaii's vulnerability to the hazard. <br /> • Coastal Erosion and Wildfire should have additional X <br /> information that states vulnerability to these hazards. <br /> • Include a discussion of historical/cultural areas in the <br /> vulnerability statements. <br /> C.Does the new or updated plan Chapter 4,Section 4.4 Hazard impact is not included for all hazards. <br /> address the impact of each hazard Chapter 5,Section 5.4 <br /> on the jurisdiction? Chapter 6,Section 6.5 Required Revision: <br /> Chapter 7,Section 7.4 The information for the impact of dam failures on pg.11-7 is <br /> Chapter 8,Section 8.4 generic to the State of Hawaii.There must be a discussion <br /> Chapter 9,Section 9.4 of the impact of dam failure specific for the County of <br /> Chapter 10,Section 10.3.1 Hawaii.This could be inferred from the provided information; <br /> however,the requirement is for the jurisdiction of this plan. <br /> Chapter 11,Section 11.4 X <br /> Chapter 12,Section 12.4 Wildfire information is inadequate.Again,most of it is for the <br /> Chapter 13,Section 13.4 State of Hawaii and not specific to the County of Hawaii. <br /> Chapter 14,Section 14.4 <br /> Chapter 15,Section 15.4 <br /> • See revised section 11.5.2.2 <br /> and new Figure 11-9. <br /> J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) A- 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.