My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan: Plan Review Crosswalk
PublicDocuments
>
Civil Defense
>
Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010
>
Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan: Plan Review Crosswalk
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2011 8:11:04 AM
Creation date
8/11/2011 8:10:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
jurisdiction participated in the plan's development? <br /> C. Does the updated plan identify all participating <br /> jurisdictions,including new,continuing,and the <br /> jurisdictions that no longer participate in the Ian? <br /> SLIMMARYSCORE <br /> N/A <br /> PLANNING PROCESS: §201.6(75): An open public involvernen1 process is essenlial to the developmeru of an ejjeclive plan. <br /> 4.Documentation of the Planning Process <br /> Requirement§201.6(b): In order to develop a more comprehensive approach to reducing the effects of natural disasters,the planning process shall include: <br /> (1) An opportunity for the public to comment on the plan during the drafting stage and prior to plan approval; <br /> (2) An opportunity for neighboring communities,local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities,and agencies that have the authority to <br /> regulate development,as well as businesses,academia and other private and non-profit interests to be involved in the planning process;and <br /> (3) Review and incorporation,if appropriate,of existing plans,studies,reports,and technical information. <br /> Requirement§201.6(c)(1): [The plan shall document]the planning process used to develop the plan,including how it was prepared,who was involved in the <br /> process,and how the public was involved. <br /> Location in the SCORE <br /> Plan(section or N S <br /> Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments <br /> A. Does the plan provide a narrative description of the Chapter 2 Element satisfied in Chapter 2 X <br /> process followed to prepare the new or updated plan? <br /> B. Does the updated plan document how the planning Chapter 1 Element discussed in Chapter 1,Appendix A.This Appendix <br /> team reviewed and analyzed each element of this Appendix A discusses the overall reorganization of the 2010 Plan.It addresses <br /> section of the plan and whether this section was revised the updates and revisions in the updated 2010 plan. <br /> as part of the update process? <br /> Referenced Although it contains a good description of this element;there is a <br /> sentence is portion missing in the 4n,section which states,"Each hazard- <br /> completed. specific chapter discusses previous/current mitigation efforts and <br /> future mitigation plan activities,so that specific recommendations <br /> are focused on each hazard.These recommendations are then---- <br /> --" that is where it ends.They need to finish the sentence. X <br /> Recommended Revision: <br /> • Complete the above referenced sentence. <br /> • Provide a more detailed statement of how the planning <br /> team reviewed each element of the plan. <br /> J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) A-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.