Reasonable Accom Proc Form Amended

Home

Reasonable Accommodation Checklist Page 4 of 5 18.The individual who requested the accommodation did not engage in the interactive process by not: o cooperating with requests for medical information o discussing his/her limitations and their impact on the performance of essential job functions. 19.The individual who requested the accommodation engaged in the interactive process by o discussing his/her limitations and their impact on the performance of essential job functions, o cooperating with requests for medical information, if needed, o suggesting alternate ways of performing job duties, o suggesting purchase of assistive equipment, o informing the decision maker what accommodations would work, o informing the decision maker what accommodations would not work. 20.If the provision of reasonable accommodation required the purchase of equipment or service the cost of which had not been budgeted, o the decision maker notified the ARM, o the ARM notified the Department Head. 21. The equipment/service was purchased. Yes No 22. If the answer is no, please explain why: 23. If the decision maker was not able to accommodate the employee in his/her regular position: o the ARM was notified; o the ARM conducted a job search within the department. 24.If the employee who requested an accommodation was referred to the Department of Human Resources for priority placement, o there were no vacant positions within the department the essential functions of which the employee could perform with or without a reasonable accommodation; o the employee posed a direct threat which could not be eliminated by a reasonable accommodation.