Laserfiche WebLink
CHR. SIRACUSA: Thank you, anybody else? <br />MR. MELROSE: We are tasked at this meeting with setting a deadline for communityÓs <br />contribution to the mapping. We are still without the data base that we will ultimately use. So, <br />I have a couple of questions; one, do we know when David will be ready, when the State <br />Elections office will have done that extraction? Is there any way for us to estimate a time in <br />which that might be available? <br /> <br />MS. NAKAMOTO <br />: I spoke with David this morning and he told me that he has been engaged <br />with the military and they understand the urgency in providing the information to them. As <br />soon as he gets the information he is going to re-populate the data base. <br />MR. MELROSE: That being the case; and military not being our issue--there <br />or five or six military--it's not an issue relative to our numbers. But, the student population is; <br />and at 1400, being able to allocate that in some way. I see two ways to approach this. One is <br />that we instruct the community to use the existing data base at this point in time, and make <br />some adjustments. I wish we could be a little bit more accurate about it, but at least make <br />some accommodations. The process of bringing numbers into a district is never going to be <br />exact. ItÓs a chunk kind of agreement. One thousand votes is a 5% variation within one <br />district. So if you are a little over 1460 votes, we are still within the variation there. So, we <br />could say that within these districts we wish to see that number higher and in the other districts, <br />for growth purposes or other things we would see those lower as part of instruction to the <br />community; to help them understand what we are going to use as guides. Or, we could just sit <br />back and wait until these numbers show up and say we arenÓt going to do anything until the <br />numbers show up, which I think frankly, puts us all behind the eight ball and it wouldnÓt be a <br />very good way to go. So, maybe David could be helpful. We are just looking for some advice <br />in how we might proceed. This issue is at the core of what we have to do today and we need to <br />figure out what is the method. We have to have a conversation about the method that we <br />advise the community to follow in this process. <br /> <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: I might mention that it is also going to affect our other job today, and that <br />is establishing the time line for submission. We have to allow <br />decent amount of time to do this work. Thank you. <br /> <br />MR. UDOVIC: I donÓt disagree with anything that you have said, and I wish that there was <br />some way for us to have the information. We did what we could tthe extractions for our <br />county very early on. We have, with the University and the Community College, not even <br />1200 people; maybe 11 hundred something. I think it is 874 and 261; that is what I recall, I <br />donÓt know if that is exact. But itÓs not a whole lot of people that we are talking about. I think <br />that we could probably be safe to start drawing plans with the population base that we have <br />now, quite frankly. Then we may have to make some adjustments based on each individual <br />census tract; but we might be able to do that. I donÓt think we <br />is just my opinion. You have to set a date now for the alternate plans to be submitted. <br /> <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Is that your personal opinion, or is that a legal opinion? <br />8 <br /> <br />