Laserfiche WebLink
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS <br />1. Approval of Minutes of the Meeting of July 12, 2011. <br />The Commission at this time took up the minutes of the previous meeting out of order. It was <br />moved by Commissioner Burns and seconded by Commissioner Au Hoy that the minutes be <br />approved as circulated. Motion was unanimously carried by a voice vote of all Commissioners <br />in attendance. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />2.Discussion of the Department of Public Works (DPW) program for revisions to Chapter 3, <br />Hawai‘i County Code (the Sign Code), including the DPW report made to the Kailua Village <br />Design Commission on May 24, 2011 and revision program information provided to the <br />Planning Department for use by the Commission. Discussion to also include alternative or <br />additional recommendations for revisions to the Sign Code as it relates to Kailua Village. <br /> The Commissioners discussed and reached consensus as to the following points: <br />In addition to the entities listed on the materials provided by the DPW, other public <br />· <br />groups that work with or may be affected by the Sign Code, such as architects, should be <br />included in the review process. <br />A projecting sign has its own function that other types of signs cannot perform, and yet it <br />· <br />is proposed to be removed from Section 3-3 Definitions. Also, the proposed version of <br />the Sign Code still makes reference to projecting signs (e.g. Section 3-11[a][4]). A better <br />explanation for the deletion other than “not relevant to new language” is needed. <br />Determination of the allowable size of sign and lettering should take account of site <br />· <br />specific factors such as the speed of travel and the building setback as opposed to the <br />current blanket approach. This could be achieved by creating a guideline chart. <br />The Kailua Village Core boundary, which was adjusted to include more land to the south <br />· <br />some years ago, should be redrawn based on the original intent for separating this section <br />from the rest of the Kailua Village Special District (KVSD), which is to identify and <br />protect its quaint fishing village atmosphere. <br />The Kailua Village Core includes both a pedestrian-oriented area and a vehicular-traffic <br />· <br />area, using the same signage regulations. These two areas should be segregated and <br />provided with different sets of requirements for signs, using the latter as a buffer zone but <br />still keeping it within the core area of the KVSD; they should be named to reflect the <br />intention, such as “Core I” and “Core II” or “Pedestrian Core” and “Vehicular Core” <br />rather than “Core” and “Buffer.” <br />Enforcement has to be in place to make the Sign Code effective. The Commission should <br />· <br />make a request that enforcement be done at least in the KVSD. <br />The Commission or its sub-committee should open a dialogue with the Kailua Village <br />· <br />Business Improvement District for the possibility of collaborative effort. <br />2 <br /> <br />