2011-03-23 KCDP Minutes Final - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Sarah Moon, the Chair of the Commission, introduced Wilma Matsumura, new Commissioner 40 and Alex Kelepolo, from the County’s Department of Finance, Property Management 41 Division. The Action Committee were provided an overview of the Commission, the status of 42 the lands that have been or are in process for acquisition, the process for Lands and/or 43 Property Entitlements for Acquisition and the difference between the comprehensive list and 44 prioritized list. Information provided was the following: 2011 Commission Roster, 45 Information Fact Sheet, a suggestion form, and the 2010 Annual Report. 46 Suggestion was made to have the Commission add in a criteria for Plans such the CDP 47 support/identification for parcels. 48 Clarification was sought for why the use of the funds, that are generated by urban area 49 parcels, which seem to be utilized for the acquisition of remote parcels rather than for more 50 urban parcels that would be accessible to more of the population. There was a lively 51 discussion regarding how to promote more urban parcels for consideration. 52 Funds are not available for the upkeep and maintenance of lands that have been acquired. 53 2. Village Design Guidelines. 54 Allen Salavea, who managed the contract for the Village Design Guidelines, has left the 55 County. Per Bennett Mark, the management of the contract and Village Design Guidelines 56 will be overseen by April Surprenant, Manager of the Long Range Division of the Planning 57 Department. 58 The discussion on the VDG continued. 59 At the Action Committee’s direction a re-drafted Article 1, which was a merge with the 60 original Article 1 and the draft Rule that PlaceMakers created, was passed out for review and 61 discussion. Corrections were made to the draft during the discussion. However, concerns 62 were raised that the language found within Article 1 is not sufficient to be defendable should 63 there be an appeal regarding the governance of the VDG over the provisions of County Code 64 and Planning Department Rules of Procedure. 65 Motions 66 Marni Herkes withdrew the original motion made in October 2010 which was to approved the 67 draft VDG with in insertion of Article 1 back in. Bob Ward withdrew his second. 68 Marni Herkes moved to recommend that the draft Article 1 – General revision 1, under review 69 be added to the VDG with the modifications made during discussion to 1.3.4b, 1.5.2, and 70 1.7.2 with the understanding that the provisions in 1.5 are complete in context and language . 71 Bob Ward seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 72 Fritz Harris-Glade moved to allow staff and/or consultant to make adjustments to correct 73 typos, spellings, punctuation, numbering and references accordingly. Bob Ward seconded. 74 Motion passed unanimously 75 Marni Herkes moved to Adopt Article 2 – Process, as amended in the red-lined version, with 76 the following revisions: that within 2.3.2 that the removed text in the first paragraph be re- 77 inserted and within 2.3.3 b. and e. that removed text be re-inserted. Fritz Harris-Glade 78 seconded. Motion passed unanimously 79 Page 2 of 4