2011-03-23 KCDP Minutes Final - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Fritz Harris-Glade moved to Adopt Article 3-Village Scale Plans-New Villages, per the red- 80 lined version, with the following revisions: that within 3.3.1b changed 40 acres to 14 acres as 81 the minimum; within 3.8.3 add back the sentence requiring 20% of the units be in affordable 82 range; and within 3.8.4 add back the second sentence related to affordable housing. Marni 83 Herkes seconded. Motion passed unanimously 84 Marni Herkes moved to Adopt Article 4-Village Scale Plans-Infill, per the red-lined version, 85 with the following revisions: that within 4.1.5 changed 40 acres to 14 acres as the minimum. 86 Bob Ward seconded. Discussion of the Article pointed out the need to have the County 87 comply with Thoroughfare Sections and the need to clarify the definition of what a mixed-use 88 corridor is. Motion passed unanimously. 89 Fritz Harris-Glade moved to Adopt Article 5-Building Scale Plans, as amended in the red- 90 lined version, retaining the 5.1.2 b. Architectural Standards reference but deleting 5.13 91 Architectural Standards Marni Herkes seconded. Discussion not only weighed the merits of 92 architectural standards established at the regional level or at the building scale level but also 93 addressed the need to clarify way the parking is valued/calculated/managed. It was also 94 pointed out that the limited/or reduced parking standards within the TOD is predicated upon 95 having a comprehensive transit system. Motion passed 5-1, Approved by Marni Herkes, Ken 96 Melrose, Bob Ward, Mike Matsukawa and Fritz Harris-Glade; Denied by Janice Palma- 97 Glennie 98 To be continued at the next meeting 99 2. KCDP Implementation. 100 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) – Bob Ward has worked incredibly hard on the information 101 presented and did an wonderful job on the testimony before the County Council. The Action 102 Committee reviewed the proposed CIP projects, that were developed from the priority 103 projects that the Action Committee have identified. 104 Fritz Harris-Glade made a motion to submit the proposed seven projects to the Planning 105 Department for inclusion to the Department CIP list. Marni Herkes seconded. Motion passed 106 unanimously. 107 th Impact Fee – There is the pending Impact Fee Bill 304 up for public hearing on April 6 in the 108 Planning Committee. It should be noted that the proposed fee is less than 50% of the fee 109 proposed by Duncan and Associates, Consultant, in 2008 as well as what the amount 110 proposed by the Public Facilities Finance Plan. It also does not propose an impact fee that 111 will be implemented “across the board,” since this does not include the DHHL lands. 112 3. Sub-Committee Reports 113 Transportation and Public Facilities 114  Department reviews for the Capital Budget will begin next week. There might be an 115 opportunity for testimony. However the next real opportunity for testimony for the CIP 116 will be after the May release of the County’s Budget. 117 Land Use, Environmental & Cultural Resources 118 Page 3 of 4