2011-06-22 KCDP Minutes Final - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Table 15 Definitions Illustrated as presented in the redlined version; and 75 Article 7 Definitions as presented in the redlined version. 76 Fritz Harris-Glade seconded. Discussion clarified the suggested amendments to each of the 77 tables (where amendments were suggested). Motion passed 5-1-1, Approved by Marni 78 Herkes, Fritz Harris-Glade, Ken Melrose, Bob Ward and Bo Kahui; Denied by Janice Palma- 79 Glennie; Abstained by Matthew Binder 80 Discussion then moved on to Table 2 Thoroughfare Assemblies. During the meeting of April 81 th 27 the Forest City Development Team suggested a number of modifications to the 82 Thoroughfare Assemblies. The suggested modifications have been made based on the 83 representation that these thoroughfares have been “vetted” by the Department of Public 84 Works during the series of meeting that the Development Team had during the Forest City 85 Exemption hearing process. It was pointed out that the appearance of the proposed 86 modifications and the thoroughfares as depicted in the VDG redline are from two different 87 perspectives which may be confusing. The Action Committee then discussed the differences 88 between the existing thoroughfare assemblies from the VDG and the proposed modifications 89 suggested by the Forest City Development Team. 90 It was also asked how, when modifications are made to the VDG, especially the 91 thoroughfares, how will these changes be maintained. The Planning Department will be the 92 repository of all changes made to the KCDP, including the VDG and its thoroughfares 93 assemblies. The website will be modified as needed to have the most up-to-date information, 94 and will also have the date of the changes made. Depending on how extensive the changes 95 that are made, it may be that the entire document will be modified or just pages. The Planning 96 Department will always have a hard copy for reference that will be kept up to date. Further 97 detail review and discussion is needed on the thoroughfare assemblies and Ken Melrose and 98 Bob Ward agreed to draft a clear motion for consideration at the next meeting. 99 Marni Herkes moved to adopt Table 12 Summary Table as presented in the redlined version, 100 with the following revisions: (a) Allocation of Zones TND T3 30% to be minimum rather than 101 maximum and T5 reduce to 5% minimum, in RCD T3 set range at 20-30%, T4 set top of 102 range at 60%, T5 set bottom of range at 20%; (b) Base Residential Density, Other Functions 103 T3 & T4 set 5% as minimum and T5 set 15% as minimum; (k) Building Configuration T5 104 change to 3 story max, 2 min. with up to 5 story by Warrant in RCD TOD. Fritz Harris- 105 Glade seconded. Discussion clarified the suggested amendments. Motion passed 5-0-1, 106 Approved by Marni Herkes, Fritz Harris-Glade, Ken Melrose, Bob Ward and Janice Palma- 107 Glennie; Abstained by Matthew Binder 108 Marni Herkes moved to adopt Table 13 A-E Form-Based Code Graphics as presented in the 109 redlined version, with the following revisions: 13 D graphic for T5 k. Principle Building 110 change to 3 story max, 2 min. with up to 5 story by Warrant in RCD TOD. Fritz Harris- 111 Glade seconded. Motion passed 5-0-1, Approved by Marni Herkes, Fritz Harris-Glade, Ken 112 Melrose, Bob Ward and Janice Palma-Glennie; Abstained by Matthew Binder 113 3. Financial Plan. 114 Page 3 of 5