|
THE PLANNED O
<br />By JOSEPH F. KUNESH, Directors
<br />KARL A. SINCLAIR, Direct07•e
<br />Senate Joint Resolution No. 12, introduced in the
<br />Legislatures on March 16, 1939, along with other special
<br />planning problemsd for reasons of expediency, was legis-
<br />lated as an item of Act 244, the biennial, Territorial Ap-
<br />propriation Act. Its salient provisions recognizing an
<br />acute situation, follow in order to record and define ac-
<br />curately the purpose and scope of this report and plan:
<br />SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 12 .
<br />PROVIDING FOR THE PREPARA'T'ION AND SUB-
<br />MISSION TO THE LEGISLATURE OF A MASTER
<br />PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY
<br />OF. HILO, COUNTY OF HAWAII
<br />WHEREAS, it is planned to relocate the . library
<br />for the City of Hilo as well as other public buildings
<br />from time to time; and .
<br />WHEREAS, there is no comprehensive plan for.
<br />the development of the civic center of Hilo nor for
<br />the orderly growth of the city as a whole, now,
<br />therefore
<br />BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE
<br />TERRITORY OF HAWAII:
<br />Section 1. That the sum of six thousand dollars
<br />($6,000)4 is hereby appropriated out of. the general
<br />revenues of the Territory for the purpose.. of prepar-
<br />ing a plan, in conjunction with the board of super
<br />visors of the County of Hawaii, of the City of Hilo,
<br />with particular reference to the location for Terri-
<br />torial buildings and civic center. Such a plan to be
<br />submitted to the next legislature for its considera-
<br />tion and approval.
<br />Thus originated the first legislative provisions for a
<br />City Master Plan in the Territory outside of th City
<br />and County of Honolulu and the previous inad :quate
<br />legislation for the City of Hilo. The proPlem, while
<br />essentially an `esthetic one, is so closely related with
<br />considerations of the utilitarian aspects as to provide
<br />a model example in the field of planning. Although
<br />city planning, as determined by enabling acts, is or-
<br />dinarily a realm of the local unit of government, the
<br />present case has been relegated to a Territorial Board
<br />due to the fact that difficulties were encountered in the
<br />relationships , between the planning and legislative
<br />bodies of the government of the City of Hilo. It is to be
<br />noted, however, that the Master Plan is entirely a
<br />flexible instrument, and, in this case, is only advisory
<br />to the Legislature and suggestive to the County Board
<br />of Supervisors of such elements as may be deemed
<br />essential. and. necessary to their final precise Official
<br />Map, without the set -up of any legislative power within
<br />the authority of the planning body.
<br />ESTHETIC ASPECTS. —This Board has been extreme-
<br />ly fortunate, in the preparation of this Plan to coordi-
<br />nate and correlate the various factors involved in esthet-
<br />ic treatment, in the availability and kind cooperation
<br />of Mr. Merel Sager, bark Planner, National Park
<br />Service, working with us on the Park, Parkway and
<br />Recreational -Area Survey provided by National Law
<br />No. 770% and taken advantage` of'. by practically all
<br />of the States, including Hawaii. Mr. Sager's interest
<br />in the beautification of the City of Hilo dates back over
<br />a period of a decade and his conceptions and conclu-
<br />sions are based largely on his fitting of the various
<br />components of park planning . into a Hawaiian pattern.
<br />His analysis and suggestions, with significant photo-
<br />graphs, accompany this..report as a. separate. section.
<br />UTILITARIAN ASPECTS. — Utilitarian aspects, as in
<br />the case of our PIans for Hanapepe and Kapaa, include
<br />°
<br />TD January. 24, 1fJ41.
<br />°
<br />From January 35, 1941.
<br />By Senator James Kealoha.
<br />a Rapaa Master Plan, and Park, Parkway and Recreational -Area
<br />Study.
<br />° Changed, and included in General Appropriation Bill, to :$3,000.
<br />the physical, the social and the economic in planning.
<br />In the previous section of this report are described
<br />the existing conditions including resources and pro-
<br />vided facilities in their various categories as estab-
<br />lished in our First Progress Report.'
<br />DESIGN. — Typical sections of streets, both business
<br />and residential (with comparative costs) are presented
<br />in an accompanying figure.
<br />HILO MASTER PLAN. —Of initial significance in the
<br />consideration of a Master Plan for the City of Hilo is
<br />the size of the City for which to plan: in other words,
<br />because of. its comparative isolation, the question of
<br />population trend is. most important, and studies were
<br />made; based: on a City within the sensible limits of from
<br />30,000 to 100,000 population, dependent on the social
<br />and economic factors :which will control Hilo's large-
<br />area capacity. Because of the confining configuration,
<br />the planning. of Hilo. according to use districts becomes
<br />very important; as in the case of the City of Honolulu,
<br />since once industrial or commercial districts have been
<br />zoned for a given area, it becomes increasingly diffi-
<br />cult to expand these .limits. without resorting to unde-
<br />sirable "spot zoning" and. destroying the original rela-
<br />tiveness: of areas one to the other: .
<br />The studies made embrace the physical require-
<br />ments of the. area. within' and contiguous to the present
<br />City of Hilo witha view: of determining the pattern
<br />and lay -out of streets; parks; etc.; so that future ex-
<br />pansion could take .. place without the necessity of hap-
<br />hazard improvisations : for commercial and industrial
<br />areas within residential districts at a later date. The
<br />various studies. were.. for cities of 100,000, 50,000, 40,000
<br />and 30,000 population, the four plans following approxi-
<br />mately. the "coordinate," "Y," "composite" and
<br />"mixed" patterns, respectively, to fit in each case the
<br />esthetic treatment providing for the civic center and
<br />park, parkway and recreational -areas within the City.
<br />After considerable deliberation with the Planning
<br />Collaborating Committee, a future city of 40,000 popu-
<br />lation was visualized and the corresponding "compos -.
<br />ite" pattern- was applied to the area required for this
<br />population. Significant observations in this study in-
<br />elude the fact that essentially Hilo is in composition a
<br />twa "ribbon',' community, following two axes: North
<br />and South, from Kilauea to Honokaa; and, East and
<br />West. along. Hilo Bay and along Wailuku Stream, with
<br />the intersection' in the vicinity of the present Civic
<br />Center,. and industrial and commercial area within the
<br />southern acute .angle of that intersection. The signifi-
<br />cance., of the crescent in the City's esthetic treatment
<br />is easily. apparent to even a novice in city planning,
<br />since it may be either obliterated by improper use or
<br />it may be exposed to full view and enjoyment of its
<br />inhabitants in its many districts.
<br />The Master Plan Map accompanying this report in-
<br />dicates an integration of the various ideas into one
<br />simplified whole of a future city of approximately.
<br />twice Hilo's present size. Provision for harbor facili-�
<br />ties are unpredictable and therefore are not included;
<br />in. detail in. this treatment. Significant is the assign
<br />ment. of areas to their several uses (industrial ,. busi-
<br />ness; residential and open areas, roads, civic center;
<br />parks, playgrounds and water areas).
<br />In connection with the plans for Hilo's Civic Center,
<br />it is essential that the policy and general design for
<br />this area be determined without further delay. .;..The
<br />decision as to its proper location is not difficult since
<br />the existing park square . (Kalakaua Park),. bounded
<br />by Waianuenue, Keawe, Kalakaua and Kinoole Streets,
<br />provides an ideal, logical and very necessary nucleus
<br />for the Civic Center.
<br />The new federal Building which faces upon .this......
<br />public square was wisely placed, and it is to be hoped
<br />that other civic buildings as they materialize in the
<br />C Sop Table of Contents, First Progress Report, February 1939
<br />
|