Laserfiche WebLink
THE PLANNED O <br />By JOSEPH F. KUNESH, Directors <br />KARL A. SINCLAIR, Direct07•e <br />Senate Joint Resolution No. 12, introduced in the <br />Legislatures on March 16, 1939, along with other special <br />planning problemsd for reasons of expediency, was legis- <br />lated as an item of Act 244, the biennial, Territorial Ap- <br />propriation Act. Its salient provisions recognizing an <br />acute situation, follow in order to record and define ac- <br />curately the purpose and scope of this report and plan: <br />SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 12 . <br />PROVIDING FOR THE PREPARA'T'ION AND SUB- <br />MISSION TO THE LEGISLATURE OF A MASTER <br />PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY <br />OF. HILO, COUNTY OF HAWAII <br />WHEREAS, it is planned to relocate the . library <br />for the City of Hilo as well as other public buildings <br />from time to time; and . <br />WHEREAS, there is no comprehensive plan for. <br />the development of the civic center of Hilo nor for <br />the orderly growth of the city as a whole, now, <br />therefore <br />BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE <br />TERRITORY OF HAWAII: <br />Section 1. That the sum of six thousand dollars <br />($6,000)4 is hereby appropriated out of. the general <br />revenues of the Territory for the purpose.. of prepar- <br />ing a plan, in conjunction with the board of super <br />visors of the County of Hawaii, of the City of Hilo, <br />with particular reference to the location for Terri- <br />torial buildings and civic center. Such a plan to be <br />submitted to the next legislature for its considera- <br />tion and approval. <br />Thus originated the first legislative provisions for a <br />City Master Plan in the Territory outside of th City <br />and County of Honolulu and the previous inad :quate <br />legislation for the City of Hilo. The proPlem, while <br />essentially an `esthetic one, is so closely related with <br />considerations of the utilitarian aspects as to provide <br />a model example in the field of planning. Although <br />city planning, as determined by enabling acts, is or- <br />dinarily a realm of the local unit of government, the <br />present case has been relegated to a Territorial Board <br />due to the fact that difficulties were encountered in the <br />relationships , between the planning and legislative <br />bodies of the government of the City of Hilo. It is to be <br />noted, however, that the Master Plan is entirely a <br />flexible instrument, and, in this case, is only advisory <br />to the Legislature and suggestive to the County Board <br />of Supervisors of such elements as may be deemed <br />essential. and. necessary to their final precise Official <br />Map, without the set -up of any legislative power within <br />the authority of the planning body. <br />ESTHETIC ASPECTS. —This Board has been extreme- <br />ly fortunate, in the preparation of this Plan to coordi- <br />nate and correlate the various factors involved in esthet- <br />ic treatment, in the availability and kind cooperation <br />of Mr. Merel Sager, bark Planner, National Park <br />Service, working with us on the Park, Parkway and <br />Recreational -Area Survey provided by National Law <br />No. 770% and taken advantage` of'. by practically all <br />of the States, including Hawaii. Mr. Sager's interest <br />in the beautification of the City of Hilo dates back over <br />a period of a decade and his conceptions and conclu- <br />sions are based largely on his fitting of the various <br />components of park planning . into a Hawaiian pattern. <br />His analysis and suggestions, with significant photo- <br />graphs, accompany this..report as a. separate. section. <br />UTILITARIAN ASPECTS. — Utilitarian aspects, as in <br />the case of our PIans for Hanapepe and Kapaa, include <br />° <br />TD January. 24, 1fJ41. <br />° <br />From January 35, 1941. <br />By Senator James Kealoha. <br />a Rapaa Master Plan, and Park, Parkway and Recreational -Area <br />Study. <br />° Changed, and included in General Appropriation Bill, to :$3,000. <br />the physical, the social and the economic in planning. <br />In the previous section of this report are described <br />the existing conditions including resources and pro- <br />vided facilities in their various categories as estab- <br />lished in our First Progress Report.' <br />DESIGN. — Typical sections of streets, both business <br />and residential (with comparative costs) are presented <br />in an accompanying figure. <br />HILO MASTER PLAN. —Of initial significance in the <br />consideration of a Master Plan for the City of Hilo is <br />the size of the City for which to plan: in other words, <br />because of. its comparative isolation, the question of <br />population trend is. most important, and studies were <br />made; based: on a City within the sensible limits of from <br />30,000 to 100,000 population, dependent on the social <br />and economic factors :which will control Hilo's large- <br />area capacity. Because of the confining configuration, <br />the planning. of Hilo. according to use districts becomes <br />very important; as in the case of the City of Honolulu, <br />since once industrial or commercial districts have been <br />zoned for a given area, it becomes increasingly diffi- <br />cult to expand these .limits. without resorting to unde- <br />sirable "spot zoning" and. destroying the original rela- <br />tiveness: of areas one to the other: . <br />The studies made embrace the physical require- <br />ments of the. area. within' and contiguous to the present <br />City of Hilo witha view: of determining the pattern <br />and lay -out of streets; parks; etc.; so that future ex- <br />pansion could take .. place without the necessity of hap- <br />hazard improvisations : for commercial and industrial <br />areas within residential districts at a later date. The <br />various studies. were.. for cities of 100,000, 50,000, 40,000 <br />and 30,000 population, the four plans following approxi- <br />mately. the "coordinate," "Y," "composite" and <br />"mixed" patterns, respectively, to fit in each case the <br />esthetic treatment providing for the civic center and <br />park, parkway and recreational -areas within the City. <br />After considerable deliberation with the Planning <br />Collaborating Committee, a future city of 40,000 popu- <br />lation was visualized and the corresponding "compos -. <br />ite" pattern- was applied to the area required for this <br />population. Significant observations in this study in- <br />elude the fact that essentially Hilo is in composition a <br />twa "ribbon',' community, following two axes: North <br />and South, from Kilauea to Honokaa; and, East and <br />West. along. Hilo Bay and along Wailuku Stream, with <br />the intersection' in the vicinity of the present Civic <br />Center,. and industrial and commercial area within the <br />southern acute .angle of that intersection. The signifi- <br />cance., of the crescent in the City's esthetic treatment <br />is easily. apparent to even a novice in city planning, <br />since it may be either obliterated by improper use or <br />it may be exposed to full view and enjoyment of its <br />inhabitants in its many districts. <br />The Master Plan Map accompanying this report in- <br />dicates an integration of the various ideas into one <br />simplified whole of a future city of approximately. <br />twice Hilo's present size. Provision for harbor facili-� <br />ties are unpredictable and therefore are not included; <br />in. detail in. this treatment. Significant is the assign <br />ment. of areas to their several uses (industrial ,. busi- <br />ness; residential and open areas, roads, civic center; <br />parks, playgrounds and water areas). <br />In connection with the plans for Hilo's Civic Center, <br />it is essential that the policy and general design for <br />this area be determined without further delay. .;..The <br />decision as to its proper location is not difficult since <br />the existing park square . (Kalakaua Park),. bounded <br />by Waianuenue, Keawe, Kalakaua and Kinoole Streets, <br />provides an ideal, logical and very necessary nucleus <br />for the Civic Center. <br />The new federal Building which faces upon .this...... <br />public square was wisely placed, and it is to be hoped <br />that other civic buildings as they materialize in the <br />C Sop Table of Contents, First Progress Report, February 1939 <br />