My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-09-23.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
MIN RDC 2011-09-23.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2011 9:16:17 AM
Creation date
10/24/2011 3:49:54 PM
Metadata
Document Relationships
MIN RDC 2011-09-23
(Original Version)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Redistricting Commission\2011 Redistricting Commission\Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
numbers. The emphasis in a lot of the conversation and the testimony we get is on other things; <br />design, compactness, community, collectivity, connections. There are a couple of things in that <br />long list, like the inability to go out of a district to drive back in to a district. That is a criteria that <br />people ought to be aware of. This does talk about the census blocks. Are there other notes or <br />ideas that we want to emphasize, that we would want to have visually put up with this? Or, is this <br />enough? <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: I have one suggestion. I like this; what you drew up is very clear, but I think <br />that some people will sit there and say, but what is the most number you can have; and what is the <br />least number you can have in any district? So I think we should add, right under where it says <br />"total deviation allowed in each district," a mention that the high would be 21,483, and the low <br />would be 19,441. <br />MR. KANUHA: Are there any other comments? <br />MR. KAHAWAIOLA`A: Is it possible - - -I believe big is always better. I would like to have <br />Communication 41.2 made about the size of the maps Karen is going to bring with her and post, if <br />that is possible. <br />MS. EOFF: Yes, that is what I was intending for that, to be a poster. <br />MR. KAHAWAIOLA`A: Thank you very much. <br />MR. KANUHA: Are we ready to take a vote on this? <br />The motion to close file on COMM. 41, regarding <br />the logistics for public hearings, was carried by <br />the following vote: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Carvalho, Kahawaiola` a, <br />Kanuha, Melrose, Middlesworth, <br />Poindexter, and Chair Siracusa. <br />Noes: None. <br />Absent: Commissioners Kahui and Ugalde. <br />ORDER OF THE DAY <br />COMM. 42: REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF REDISTRICTING PLANS /MAPS <br />From Commission Chair Rene Siracusa, dated September 15, 2011, requesting the <br />Commission's review of Redistricting Plans /Maps that have been submitted, and <br />continue the formal process for elimination of Plans. This discussion will include <br />Plans previously received, as well as Plan-20 through Plan-39, which were <br />received by the posting date of this agenda, September 15, 2011. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.