MIN RDC 2011-09-23.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

you have this traditional kind of connectivity. If you are looking to go back in a traditional sense about commerce, but in terms of people and their communities; I think they are quite distinct. That's the only thing I had to make a comment about, but I'm open to anything. MR. KANUHA: Are there any other comments? MR. CARVALHO: I would like to go up to the Waikoloa area. I think Puako is in Council District 8. I know we are splitting Waikoloa, but this looks pretty good for Council District 9. Can we go out to Waimea? That is the Lakeland area. So the east side of Waimea looks okay from my constituents' point of view. MR. MELROSE: I'm looking for Waiki`i. It looks like we have isolated Waiki`i. We have split Waiki`i in half so you have a portion there that can't get back to the district as well. There are not enough votes there to make that a big deal, but it would need to be adjusted. Waiki ` i, to me, belongs connected to Waimea, since that's its kind of logical day to day connection. MR. CARVALHO: I agree with you. Mr. Melrose moved to reject Plan _27, based on the non - connectivity of several of the districts. Seconded by Ms. Siracusa and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Carvalho, Kahawaiola` a, Kahui, Kanuha, Melrose, Middlesworth, Poindexter, and Chair Siracusa. Noes: None. Absent: Commissioner Ugalde. Review and Discuss Plan 28 MR. KANUHA: We are moving on to Plan-28. CHR. SIRACUSA: I don't see any difference at all between Plan _28 and Plan-29, unless there is a very fine tuned district line somewhere, all the numbers are exactly the same. MR. KANUHA: Yes they are. I think it might have been a submitting error. CHR. SIRACUSA: Under the circumstances then, I would suggest that whatever we decide for Plan _28, we immediately, thereafter duplicate for Plan-29, since they are exactly the same. MR. KANUHA: Okay, we can do that. Are there any comments on Plan-28? 19