My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-09-23.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
MIN RDC 2011-09-23.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2011 9:16:17 AM
Creation date
10/24/2011 3:49:54 PM
Metadata
Document Relationships
MIN RDC 2011-09-23
(Original Version)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Redistricting Commission\2011 Redistricting Commission\Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. UDOVIC: I think, quite frankly, you can take a look at it. Since you had public testimony <br />regarding this, you can take a look at the elements that were done. Ultimately, your own map is <br />going to come out anyways, and so you can take those matters into consideration; which I think is <br />what the primary concern i s . <br />MR. KANUHA: Definitely, but if we move to reject Plan-39, and then accept her corrected <br />version, are we - -- <br />MR. UDOVIC: Well, you are past the deadline, but I'm saying that you can use the elements that <br />she is describing in your consideration. Do you follow me? You may reject a map, but you are <br />not rejecting the concepts. <br />MR. MELROSE: I think her concepts are valid. Can you go into the lower portion of Council <br />District 1 and see how it wraps around the town. Are we picking up Kaumana City in District I? <br />MR. KAHAWAIOLA`A: For a point of clarification, which map are we looking at? <br />MR. KANUHA: I think we are on the corrected one. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Excuse me, we didn't vote on Plan _3 9, the first one. We should get that out <br />of the way first because of the deviations, and then we can discuss Plan-39, corrected. <br />MR. KANUHA: That is what I was trying to bring up. <br />Mr. Kahui moved to re j ect Plan _3 9, based <br />on high deviations. Seconded by Mr. Melrose <br />and carried by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Kahawaiola`a, Kahui, <br />Kanuha, Melrose, Middlesworth, <br />Poindexter, Ugalde and Chair Siracusa. <br />Noes: None. <br />Absent: Commissioner Carvalho. <br />Review and Discuss Plan 39 as corrected <br />MR. KANUHA: Moving on to Plan-39 as corrected. <br />MR. MELROSE: It did look like in that last look that the population above Kaumana City, the <br />reason that map looks so odd is that it includes areas of no population that really should be in <br />District 2. That is just a non knowing in the mapping process. I understood from Mr. Udovic, <br />that because this map actually did not meet the deadline, it isn't a matter of us being able to <br />accept it, but we can accept the concepts; is that what I heard? <br />MR. MIDDLESWORTH: And we could draw one exactly like it. <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.