My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-09-23.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
MIN RDC 2011-09-23.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2011 9:16:17 AM
Creation date
10/24/2011 3:49:54 PM
Metadata
Document Relationships
MIN RDC 2011-09-23
(Original Version)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Redistricting Commission\2011 Redistricting Commission\Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. POINDEXTER: Could we, say, make little changes on this on and then save it as Plan _40`? <br />Why don't we work on this a little and save it as Plan_40, so we would still have all that concept <br />in here. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: This map has only one district for Puna. <br />MR. MELROSE: There are two. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Panaewa and Keaukaha, Hawaiian Homelands are in two different districts. <br />Paradise Park is divided from Kea' au to Mountain View and half of Paradise Park have been sent <br />off to Hilo and Volcano is in Ka`u. So, whether or not this came in on time or not, I would <br />certainly want to move to reject it. I do want to thank Margaret for admitting that she doesn't <br />know the Puna area, because that is definitely reflected in this map. <br />MS. POINDEXTER: But would you be willing to work on this? You could make some changes <br />right now on the map with what you are saying that doesn't look right, and have them do it right <br />now in front of us and see what the deviations would be. Then, we could save it as another map. <br />We could reject it, and save it as another map. But, would you want to try to see what kind of <br />work you could do in this area right now? <br />MR. KANUHA: Personally, for me, I want to keep on looking at this map to see if we want to <br />reject it or not. Yes, Rene, you did have some issues with Puna, but I wanted to look around the <br />whole island to see what issues I have with some of the other districts before we make a motion to <br />accept or reject. <br />MR. MELROSE: I would also like to suggest that you look more closely at the map in the area <br />that you just said, because there are two votes in the Puna district. There is no overlap from the <br />Hilo district into the Puna district. There is the kind of move from District 6 in, but there are two <br />clear and entire Puna districts and no incursion from the other side. Those were part of your <br />rationale, but I don't think that it is true if you look at the map more closely. <br />MR. KAHUI: We were going to look at these maps without doing much amending, either to <br />accept it for now and then we can go back on our own and review this without taking much of the <br />public and commission time. I, for one, when looking at this map, I'm alright with it. Then I <br />think in our own investigations, when we review this map, like all the others that we have saved, <br />we can go in and extrapolate what you want out of it. <br />MS. POINDEXTER: I don't think we can save this map because of when it was submitted. That <br />is why I was saying, can we make a little change to it, and I was going to suggest that Rene start <br />making some change so we could save it as Plan _40. We could reject Plan _3 9 and we could save <br />it as Plan_40, so we would still save some of the concepts that we said we wanted to keep in <br />there. <br />MR. KAHUI: I can agree to that. <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.