Laserfiche WebLink
The group wondered if it were possible to change the way community and government <br /> interact and work together. The term "living plan" describes the group's idea of a planning process <br /> that adapts to change and remains alive and relevant through continuing input from the community. <br /> Implementation, measuring progress, evaluation and revision are vital components of a living plan. <br /> Instead of a linear process that moves from idea to action to completion, the living plan would take <br /> on a more circular and ongoing process. The intent was to make community planning an important <br /> part of civic life. There is power in a collaborative community/government planning process. <br /> One of the common complaints heard at that initial community workshop was that there was <br /> too much talk and not enough action. The group knew that a follow-up workshop must be organized <br /> quickly to capitalize on the momentum from the first workshop. No one felt up to the task of <br /> facilitating a community workshop, however, and the committee realized that they needed <br /> professional help. They called on the local, dynamic facilitation team of Gail Clarke and Diane <br /> Gentry of Learning Unlimited for help. After their first strategy session with Diane, the group <br /> discovered that they could not precisely articulate what they were trying to accomplish. It had <br /> seemed clear to them that the goal was a community-based plan for Downtown Hilo, yet they could <br /> not describe what the content of the next workshop should be. Both Gail and Diane made the <br /> group back up, slow down, and really consider their plan: What is the plan? What is the vision? <br /> Who are the stakeholders? What are the next steps? <br /> The group soldiered on in preparation for a second community workshop. They realized that <br /> they needed more community input before they could draft a vision. Keeping their living plan theory <br /> as a platform, they wanted to start the community thinking about actual implementation. To ensure <br /> buy-in, the community must be implementation partners with government and other agencies. <br /> Therefore, the second workshop was designed to accomplish both visioning and the beginning steps <br /> of action planning. <br /> Workshop #2 Open Space Technology is an approach to <br /> conferences developed in the mid-]980s. <br /> The second community visioning workshop was held on May Key Principals: <br /> 24, 2004, in two 2 1/2 hour sessions. This participatory workshop ''Everyone who comes to an Open Space <br /> on community visioning asked the question, 'What do we want conference must be passionate about the <br /> topic and willing to take some responsibility <br /> Downtown Hilo to look like in one, five, or even fifteen years? for creating things out of that passion. <br /> Diane Gentry and Gail Clarke led both sessions using Open-Space <br /> Whoever comes Is the right people, <br /> Technology techniques. Participants brainstormed possible <br /> categories, or focus areas, for the hundreds of vision ideas generated Whatever happens is the only thing that <br /> at this and the previous workshop. They then divided themselves into could have. <br /> small groups by these new categories. Some of the focus areas that whenever it starts is the right time. <br /> were identified included: when it is overt is over.'' <br /> • Beautification —wires, open Wailuku River, sidewalks <br /> • Hilo as a cultural gem <br /> • Cruise ships —welcome, crafts, cafes, town squares <br />