My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-10-21.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
MIN RDC 2011-10-21.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2011 10:24:11 AM
Creation date
11/18/2011 4:02:29 PM
Metadata
Document Relationships
MIN RDC 2011-10-21
(Original Version)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Redistricting Commission\2011 Redistricting Commission\Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
didn't accept any more official Alternate Plans." So the plans that Margaret was sending, and I <br />explained this to her, are being given to you as part of her public testimony. And she is making <br />the name, the numbers that are on those .plan files that I'm sending you, that is how she saves <br />them. So I'm not changing anything there, I'm just submitting them to you as her public <br />testimony for a better understanding of what she is trying to do, we are accepting the .plan file as <br />an attachment to her testimony. That is what it is. <br />Since then, Mike Middlesworth did submit, what he named Plan _46. There was nothing in <br />between Plan _40, and all the alternatives to Plan _40 that came to us. Mike just named it that, so I <br />kept Plan _46 as its name, and I asked Shyla to save it in her computer so we could look at it today <br />for a better understanding of that. <br />MS. POINDEXTER: It's his wishful age. <br />MS. EOFF: I also told Margaret that we have given Shyla her previous submitted alternates to <br />Plan _40, but I think at this point what she said today was the one that is her most current, is the <br />one she wants you to consider if you do any consideration of her submission. But it isn't an <br />official Alternate Plan. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Because it contains all the previous tweaks. <br />MS. EOFF: It contains all of her changes. <br />MR. KANUHA: Karen, the plan submitted by Mike was, I'm just trying to understand, is it a <br />plan that is given to all of us, or is it a submitted plan? I just don't understand. <br />MS. EOFF: Mike just wanted to be able to discuss his idea with you today, without starting from <br />scratch, so he created it over the week and sent it through. It's actually just something like public <br />testimony at this point. It is another idea; nothing past September 15, 2011, can be considered as <br />an official Alternate Plan. If we ever did have a legal issue, and somebody wanted to challenge <br />an Alternate Plan as opposed to the plan that you folks decide on as a Final Plan, only those plans <br />submitted up until September 15, 2011 would be official Alternate Plans. <br />MR. KANUHA: So, it's just part of another testimony. <br />MS. EOFF: Yes, you can consider it like that. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: But we can consider it when we start to create our Draft Plan, is that correct? <br />We can consider anything, right? <br />MS. EOFF: Yes, you can work off of it, you can work off of anything you want. Now, you are in <br />a different phase; my understanding is you are creating a Commission's Draft Plan based on <br />whatever you have looked at previously, or heard in testimony and want to make. So, from here <br />on out I would suggest saving anything the Commission creates as Commission's Draft Plan _A, <br />Commission's Draft Plan B, and we will save those in a separate folder so they can be referred to <br />and looked back at. But you guys need to now make your Draft Plans, and call them that. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.