Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 2 – Subsidence and Other Coastal Hazards at Kapoho <br />One of the main objectives of this report and study was to determine the nature <br />of subsidence in the Kapoho area and answer the key question -- is the subsidence <br />episodic only -- or episodic and continuous? Once the nature of subsidence was <br />determined, it would be possible to fit it into the overall determination of hazard risk <br />in the Kapoho area, and create mitigation measures that are suited to the <br />characteristics of this site. The development of mitigation measures for the area is <br />dependant on the hazard risk and is covered in Chapter 4, which deals with <br />administration of the Special Management Area. In this Chapter, insight into the <br />hazard risk is provided. <br />2.1 Ongoing Subsidence at Kapoho <br />A major portion of this project was to gather the information necessary that <br />would be vital for planning purposes. Most importantly, it was necessary to <br />determine if the subsidence at Kapoho was ongoing, and if so, what is the magnitude <br />of the change. Dr. Ben Brooks and his team from the Pacific GPS Facility at the <br />School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaii was <br />contacted to assist for this issue. Using Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry <br />(InSAR) techniques and radar data from the European Space Agency’s Envisat, an <br />estimate for subsidence at Kapoho could be determined for the period from February <br />12, 2003 to March 8, 2006. The full body of the report, explaining the methodology, <br />the results and limitations is found in Appendix A. This section contains a very brief <br />description of the major findings. <br /> From the InSAR study, the immediate Kapoho region experienced average <br />downward vertical motions, with respect to Hilo of between ~ -0.7 and -1.6 cm/yr +/- <br />0.6 cm/yr. The 0.6 cm/yr. represents 2 standard deviations. Combined with the rising <br />sea levels measured in Hilo and believed to be representative for Kapoho, the relative <br />sea level rise for Kapoho has thus been estimated to be ~0.8 to 1.7 cm/yr +/- 0.8 <br />cm/yr (2 standard deviations). <br /> Several key points should be made from the study. First, the subsidence at <br />Kapoho is at least an order of magnitude greater than the sea-level change recorded at <br />the Hilo tide station. So local land motion dominates over relative sea-level change <br />for this particular area and time interval. Also the authors do not attribute the <br />subsidence to any particular cause as this was outside the scope of the study. <br /> Finally the authors note, and this report concurs that the area should continue <br />to be monitored since so much is at stake. It is not known if there are variations in <br />the rate of subsidence over time and to what extent the continuous subsidence relieves <br />stress that over time may cause episodic larger events (see next section). In other <br />9 <br /> <br />