My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-11-10.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
MIN RDC 2011-11-10.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2011 10:55:47 AM
Creation date
12/13/2011 8:21:54 AM
Metadata
Document Relationships
MIN RDC 2011-11-10
(Original Version)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Redistricting Commission\2011 Redistricting Commission\Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review and Discuss Commission Draft Plan B <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Thank you. So we have that on the map right in front of us at the <br />moment. Commissioner Middlesworth is up there with Shyla. I just want to explain <br />something to the other Commissioners. In my map, RS3, I had done a configuration for <br />Puna that was a mauka /makai based configuration. One of the homework assignments for <br />the Commissioners was for me to try to put that, translate that configuration into Draft <br />Plan _B. And when I tried to do it, census block by census block, I came up with a 1,000 <br />resident difference; which should not happen. So, I put a call through to Royce this <br />morning, at ESRI and asked him if that is possible that could happen, and he said it is if the <br />extractions were not migrated to the base map on which Plan _B or Plan _A was. So we <br />looked at that, and that was not the case. The extractions were done on both of those base <br />plan maps; so that is not the problem. So I asked Shyla if she could see if she could play <br />with that and get the same configuration into a mauka /makai configuration into Plan _B. <br />There are some major problems with the way the census blocks are laid out here. Do we <br />need to give you some time here, Shyla? <br />We did see my plan RS3, and it wasn't good for the rest of the island. I had asked the <br />Commissioners if they would be willing to tweak their respective boundaries, but nobody <br />wanted to go there. But that configuration was the one that worked best for Puna; for the <br />two Puna districts. So my homework assignment was to try and see if I could translate that <br />configuration, not the one that is here, but the mauka /makai configuration, on to Draft <br />Plan _B. And I couldn't get the numbers to work, unfortunately. So I asked Shyla to see if <br />she could get it to work, because she is better at this than I am. It would start at Kalapana, <br />down at the very bottom, Shyla; and put that into District 4. <br />MR. MELROSE: I bet you that the problem you came into was that you ended up cutting <br />HPP. Can you get there without cutting one of those big subdivisions? <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: What happened was on one of the maps, the Maku`u Hawaiian Homes, <br />which spans both sides of the Highway, if it goes into District 5, then you can't get from <br />other parts of District 4 to HPP without driving through Maku`u Hawaiian Homelands, <br />which is District 5. There is no other way in. Can we see your numbers now? We are way <br />over. That is the same problem I was having when I tried to do that. <br />MR. MELROSE: So, then you need to transfer back HPP into - - -It needs to go into the <br />brown district; whatever number that is. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: You are saying to put Hawaiian Paradise Park into District 5? <br />MR. MELROSE: Of course. It is the only way to do it. I'm not sure you can do that and <br />keep the numbers right. That is the challenge. <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.