My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
IPFNA_Final_Sept_06
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
General Planning Department Information
>
IPFNA
>
IPFNA Study
>
IPFNA_Final_Sept_06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2011 11:02:39 AM
Creation date
12/21/2011 10:57:16 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PART I: POLICY ANALYSIS <br />CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION <br />The purpose of this study is to calculate the maximum impact fees that HawaiÓi County can charge <br />on the existing levels of service for the Big Island Ôs major road network, parks and recreation facilities, <br />police, fire/EMS, wastewater treatment and solid waste facilities. If adopted, impact fees would replace <br />the CountyÔs current system of Ñfair shareÒ assessment. <br />This project has been divided into two phases. Phase I previously identified facilities for which it would <br />be feasible to develop impact fees based on availa ble data and other factors. This Phase II report <br />presents detailed impact fee studies necessary to im plement the policy decisions made in Phase I and <br />develop an impact fee ordinance. <br />Current Fair Share Contributions <br />Since the early 1990s, the County of HawaiÓi has impos ed Ñfair shareÒ assessments on applicants for new <br />residential (including agricultural lots zoned one acre or less in size) and hotel zoning. The fees, which <br />are imposed as a condition of zoni ng approval, are collected prior to securing final subdivision approval <br />for newly created lots or prior to obtaining final pl an approval for multi-family or hotel development. <br />The fees, which are adjusted annually for inflat ion based on the Honolulu Consumer Price Index (CPI), <br />currently (as of November 2005) total approxim ately $9,991.20 per dwelling unit; $6,411.25 for <br />multi-family; and $10,994.22 for re sort, per rental unit. The assessm ents are collected for roads, parks, <br />fire, police and solid waste facilities. <br />The CountyÔs fair share assessments have never been adopted as an ordinance, although the County <br />Council did pass a general authorization in 1992 for the collection of such fees as a condition of <br />development approval in 1992 (HawaiÓi County Cod e §2-162). The fees are based on an impact fee <br />study that was prepared by a consultant in 1990, but was never f <br />1 <br />County. The fees calculated in that report are adj usted annually based on the change in the Honolulu <br />Consumer Price Index. <br />Many of the zoning ordinances passed by the HawaiÓi County Council in recent years contain a <br />provision requiring that in the even t an impact fee ordinance is adopted, it will give credit for th <br />share contributions. A typical provision reads as follows: ÑShould the Council adopt a Unified Impact <br />Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria for imposit ion of exactions or assessment of impact fees, <br />conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees <br />2 <br />Ordinance.Ò <br />While the fair share assessments are substantial, they have not <br />done in 2004 determined that over $74 million had been assessed on new approved rezonings in the ten <br />years of the program, but only $3.6 million had b een collected in cash and another $15.2 million had <br />1 <br />Ann Usagawa, Development Impact Fee Pricing Technical Report , August 1990 <br />2 <br /> Ordinance No. 05-74, adopted on May 18, 2005 <br />H Ó C \I N A ÐI F S September 19, 2006, Page 7 <br />AWAI I OUNTY NFRASTRUCTURE EEDS SSESSMENT MPACT EE TUDY <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.