Laserfiche WebLink
FACILITATORS REPORT FORMS – COMPILED BY ISSUES IN ALPHA ORDER <br />KONA: <br />ISSUE A: TYPES OF FEES <br />Kona Group 2 <br />Summary of discussion: Is there a better method to supply water to those who do not have access <br />except catchment? Can impact fees remedy this if charter were changed, or what could be done? <br />Agree that we need the fees. Would like to include water but we don’t know how. <br />FINAL POLL: Group checked “Yes” but no number of how many polled. Would like to include <br />water (see above) <br />Kona Group 4 <br />Summary of discussion: Can Impact Fees cover public buildings? Can we include water systems in <br />the Impact Fees? Impact Fees to cover new flood channels and flooding issues? Parking lots? <br />Underground utilities? But lots of options discussed we had a different idea about covering flooding. <br />(Did not do Poll) <br />ISSUE B: EXISTING LOTS OF RECORD <br />Kona Group 1 <br />Summary of discussion: Why exclude Puna and Ka`u- they are lacking in infrastructure and should <br />be included. We agree they SHOULD BE INCLUDED. We agree possibly have a share cost with <br />County for low-income owner. <br />Option 5: Treat everyone equally, with some subsidy to low-income homebuilder on single-family <br />lots. One year to implement – grace period during which time fair share assessment would still <br />apply. <br />FINAL POLL: Zero for Options 1 – 4. No written number on poll on Option 5 except as noted in <br />discussion above. <br />Kona Group 2 <br />Summary of discussion: Discussion of existing lots and how to assess them. There is a consensus <br />that we decide to add #5 that all existing lots should be assessed an impact fee to be collected at the <br />time of pulling building permit. <br />Option 5: We have a consensus that we want to add alternative #5. All existing lots should be <br />assessed an impact fee to be collected at time of pulling building permit. <br />(Did not do Poll) <br />Kona Group 3 <br />Summary of discussion: Puna & Ka`u don’t have service? If not going assess fees in Puna & Kau <br />where is money coming from? If more lots zoned than houses #1 without paying fee (if #1) double. <br />Why shouldn’t everyone pay? What affect on affordable housing does everyone pays have? <br />How can we assess three options without knowing what is wrong with current system? <br />Are these options mutually exclusive? No rationale for exempting. <br />Option 5: Fees same across the line. All new buildings pay impact fees. Adjustment for lower <br />income. Progressive schedule. <br />Option 6: Existing lots of record with existing owners of record with a grace period of 2-5 years to <br />build without impact fee. <br />10 <br /> <br />