Laserfiche WebLink
FINAL POLL: 3 for Option 5; 1 for Option 6 <br />Kona Group 4 <br />Summary of discussion: Exclude Ka`u and Puna means no services. Reject #4 <br />Why is there no option #5 that says we charge full fees for development? Why would Puna and <br />Ka`u be excluded? The poor should not have to pay impact fees for their housing. This fits in at <br />time of permits. <br />Option 5: We charge full fees to everyone (residence, commercial, industrial, multi-family) at <br />building permit level. <br />FINAL POLL: Zero for Options 1, 2 and 4. 1 for Option 3; 4 for Option 5. <br />Kona Group 5 <br />Summary of discussion: Most of the group felt that the unintended consequences associated with an <br />exemption or exemption period would create negative impacts. Most of the group voted to have NO <br />exemption. Most of the group would like to have the no exemption approach coupled with a sliding <br />scale based upon the size (square footage) of the residence. Questions arose as to what was included <br />in the counted lots (were ag. lots included?). A question was raised as to whether social engineering <br />was behind the impact fee policy. <br />Option 5: <br />a.No exemption for existing lots, but provide a sliding scale based upon home size (Sq. Ftge.) <br />b.No exemption and no sliding scale <br />FINAL POLL: Zero for Options 1, 2 and 4; 2 for Option 3; 6 for Option 5a; 3 for Option 5b <br />Kona Group 6 <br />Summary of discussion: What is the magic of a 5-year period? What is the nexus? <br />Does 2-5 year period provide an advantage to developers vs. local residents? <br />nd <br />Option 5: Bonafide farm dwelling (2 house for workers) should be exempt and not give time <br />advantage to big any developer over local residents. <br />FINAL POLL: As written: Option 1 _No_ Option 2 __No_ Option 3 Mixed Option 4 <br />unconstitutional best if can include option 5 <br />ISSUE C: TIME OF COLLECTION <br />Kona Group 1 <br />Summary of discussion: When fees collected <br />a)Agree with recommendations collect at time of building permit. <br />b)Will impact fees lead to more non-permitted (illegal) construction <br />c)More site inspections for illegal buildings to collect impact fees/taxes <br />(No “FINAL POLL” printed on worksheet) Group checked “Yes” and noted “with above <br />recommendations” <br />ISSUE D: PRE-ORDINANCE CREDITS <br />Kona Group 4 <br />No reimbursement of fees? If the fair share is less than the impact fee does the developer get charged <br />more? <br />FINAL POLL: Confusing question. <br />11 <br /> <br />