My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Memo_Yagong_Planning Dept Comments 304 Dr April_11
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
General Planning Department Information
>
IPFNA
>
Impact Fee Correspondences
>
Memo_Yagong_Planning Dept Comments 304 Dr April_11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2011 8:57:57 AM
Creation date
12/21/2011 2:09:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Comments on Bill 364 <br />Prepared by <br />Co of HI Planning Department <br />April 5, 2611 <br />Funding (36 -23) and Benefit Zones (36 -24) <br />• Reorganize 36.23 per changes to 36 -24. <br />• Consider tailoring assessments to unique conditions in each benefit zone. <br />For example, in Puna and Ka`u, where most of the facilities are on private land <br />and the roads are either private or state, maybe roads should be excluded. <br />• Add new wording to clarify the need for sub accounts and a county wide <br />benefit zone: 36 -23 (d) "Within each account, with the exception of the <br />wastewater impact fee account, there are hereby created 6 sub- accounts, <br />corresponding to the five (5) sub -area benefit zones and one county -wide benefit <br />zone. The sub -area benefit zones are hereby created." <br />Benefit Zones (36-24(e) <br />■ More appropriate zones would be to follow the CDP planning areas: Puna, <br />S. Hilo, N. HilolHamakua, N. Kohala, S. Kohala, Kona, and Ka`u. <br />Capital Improvement Program (36 -24) <br />• References to the process for developing the CIP budget (and using impact <br />fee moneys) should be consistent with the Charter. <br />o The head of each county agency shall furnish the mayor estimates of any <br />capital improvements pending or proposed to be undertaken within the <br />ensuing fiscal year and within the five fiscal years thereafter. (Section 10- <br />2(b)(2)) <br />o The Planning Director reviews the lists of proposed capital improvements <br />contemplated by agencies of the county and recommends the order of <br />their priority. (Section 6 - 7.2(b)(4)) <br />o The Managing Director recommends to the mayor the annual operating <br />and capital improvement budget. (Section 6- 1.3(c)) <br />o The Finance Department assists the mayor in the preparation of the <br />capital budget. (Section 6- 6.3(a)) <br />o The Mayor submits an annual capital budget, six -year capital program, <br />and budget message to the Council. (Section 10- 2(a)). <br />• 36 -22(b) and 36 -24(c) should be consistent, per the Charter. 22 indicates that <br />the fund administrator (i.e., Finance) presents the CIP, and 24 indicates that <br />Planning establishes the CIP. The Charter specifies that the Mayor /Managing <br />Director /Finance prepare the CIP budget. <br />• Are impact fee funds appropriated by Council? <br />• Does HRS allow fees to be used to pay debt service? <br />SFCTION 3-- <br />• change "approval" to "adoption." <br />• At least 2 years will be needed to establish the new impact fee system, <br />given all the cross - agency responsibilities, the transition from Fair Share, and <br />challenges of implementation (see below). <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.