My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-12-16.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
MIN RDC 2011-12-16.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2011 8:56:43 AM
Creation date
12/23/2011 9:57:16 AM
Metadata
Document Relationships
MIN RDC 2011-12-16
(Original Version)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Redistricting Commission\2011 Redistricting Commission\Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHR. SIRACUSA: Oh, before I even read it? Just for the record, let me read it anyway. <br />MR. KAHUL Okay. <br />MR. MELROSE: She only has a couple more times to do this. <br />COMM. 59: DISCUSSION REGARDING FINAL REPORT <br />From Commission Chair Rene Siracusa, dated December 10, 2011, regarding the <br />preparation and filing of the Commission's Final Report to the County Clerk. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Mike isn't here right now, but as you know, Mike is putting <br />MS. POINDEXTER: We need a motion. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Oh, sorry, sorry, sorry. <br />Mr. Kahui moved to close file on COMM. 59 <br />Seconded by Ms. Ugalde. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: However, Mike is doing the part, writing the part of the Final <br />Report that is the part that is required by law. Karen and Maile have already done the <br />whole chart listing all of the maps that we reviewed and the reasons why they were <br />accepted or declined or tweaked, or whatever; and Mike's part is going through the <br />entire reasoning for every line that we drew and every change that we drew, so that's <br />on the record. That is the basic thing that is required in the Final Report. But, above <br />and beyond that, as you know, you Commissioners have all made comments during <br />the course of this process about things that we would like to see changed in the future, <br />so that God forbid, if we end up on the Commission again in ten year's time, we don't <br />have to deal with some of the same problems. <br />So, I would like especially, if those of you who haven't done so already, remind you to <br />please write out your comments and your suggestions, especially, you know, talk <br />about things that you felt were rather obstacles to our ability to do our job; and make <br />suggestions as to how they can be resolved so it can be better next time. And, it would <br />really help a lot, I think if you could identify, at least within your own districts, those <br />bizarre census blocks. All you have to do is put your cursor on the "identify" and then <br />click on the census block in question and a box pops down with a very long string of <br />numbers, and that is the identifying number for that census block. So that if your <br />report includes the problematic census block, just state where it is and what the <br />problem is with it, then hopefully, if the administration follows our recommendations, <br />and asks the Census Bureau to go back and fix or reconfigure some of these, the <br />Census Bureau will know which ones to look at and what is wrong with them and why <br />we want them fixed. And we might get a better response from them, because I <br />understand that last time they were asked to fix them but they weren't given details <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.