Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />Margaret Horwatt met with Debbie Chang and also Mike Fischer on the topic. Debbie <br />Chang is on a committee for open access that advises the DLNR. Margaret has learned <br />that the DLNR can at any time apply for a withdrawal of an easement in a lease. The <br />process of obtaining public access will be a two to five year process involving <br />paperwork, public meetings, fence lines and reports on historic value. <br />The AC does not want to hinder Parker Ranch, Margaret said, because they have been <br />fine stewards. She wants the community to take ownership of the matter and is reaching <br />out to the community for this purpose. She is contacting trails people, PATH and others. <br />More research will be critical to successfully developing an easement. <br />Discussion: <br />Mike Fischer agreed the AC should serve as a liaison and not as the <br />leader. Achahn Schulze spoke of a possible prescriptive easement. Deborah Chang had <br />suggested holding a public information night with expert guest speakers, including <br />speakers on Hawaiian values, to learn about the pu‘u’s. Another public meeting would be <br />needed for the neighbors. Parking and entry and exit are among issues. Margaret <br />supported both of Debbie’s ideas. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />5) Review Draft Operating Guidelines <br />A copy of draft guidelines incorporating AC members’ comments but not including CDP <br />language had been circulated. Discussion followed: <br />If the AC acts, then the Deputy Corporation Counsel will need to review the document <br />for legality. <br />The AC will operate on a calendar year, not a fiscal year. <br />The relevant statute is unclear about whether the AC may temporarily fill a vacancy. <br />Members of the public, who have not been appointed, are not supposed to engage in <br />debate with the AC. Members of the public give presentations or statements. <br />Motion: <br /> Jeannie Palermo made a motion, which Margaret Horwatt seconded, to adopt <br />the guidelines as distributed. <br />Further Discussion: <br />Achahn Shulze observed that section 5(h) allows the AC to make a <br />request for final plan review. What is the procedure? If a request is made, must the <br />Planning Department accept it? Mike Fischer referenced section 16-6(5) of the statute <br />which said the AC can make requests. The AC’s requests should be reasonable and well <br />defined, he believed. <br /> <br />