Laserfiche WebLink
that improvement on the other side of the existing road, it would not make sense from an <br />engineering point, if we would make that turn too sharp. It’s already a very sharp turn, trying to <br />either make a left turn off of Māmalahoa Highway or making a right turn onto it from the Old <br />Government Road. That’s the reason why we are stepping back and letting you know that not only <br />is our request consistent with what we normally do in asking for a half the difference between the <br />standard road and the existing right-of-way, but also because the unique condition at this location <br />calls for the additional pavements, which are, the additional pavement is minimal. We are asking <br />for the ultimate traveled way to be 16 feet for two-way traffic; that’s as about little as you can get <br />by with. And then in addition to that, another four or four and a half feet for shoulder to give a little <br />bit roadside clearance. So let’s say if you had a shoulder, a person could be walking along the <br />shoulder, you know, if somebody were to put a retaining, I mean, a wall along the property line or a <br />fence along the property line, there is such a thing called a shy distance you want to maintain from <br />the traveled way. Otherwise, you know, people are not going to be able to drive right up against the <br />fence. So that’s the reason for our comment in our revised memo today to try to explain that. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Director? <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Mr. Emler, this particular road starts over here and then ends up by Kona Imin <br />Center. Am I correct? <br /> <br />EMLER: That’s correct. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: So a very short segment. What if you made it one-way? <br /> <br />EMLER: Well, I did take that -. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Because then you wouldn’t need 50 feet, right, if you made it a one-way <br />street, because you don’t need two lanes of traffic. And since there is an entrance at both sides, the <br />people who live there would, and they are not very far apart, the people who live there would <br />quickly learn where you had to turn in to get to their homes. <br /> <br />EMLER: That is definitely a consideration that I thought of. But the problem with that is that I <br />believe requires a traffic code amendment and has to go through the Traffic Division and go <br />through all kinds of review. And also, there could be people who live along the road that would not <br />want it changed to a one-way road. And so I think it would require some kind of a zoning change, <br />which is outside of the scope of what we are considering here. And that’s why I dropped it as a, <br />considering it as a possibility for this, for the purpose of this application. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: But I also suspect that some people along that road might object to it <br />becoming a 50-foot wide roadway, because given the short distance of it and the fact that almost all <br />the properties along that that use that road for access are residential; the commercial properties <br />primarily use the Māmalahoa on the, you know, other side. And it’s been my experience that a lot <br />of people don’t want, especially in residential areas, they want stuff that’s traffic calming. And <br />widening it will increase speed. <br /> <br />But my biggest concern in this area which, it’s not an engineering, it’s not the type of concern that <br />we normally, you know, come up with when we are planning because typically we take the <br />comments from DPW and we put them in. My concern is that we have conflicting mandates in <br />Kona. One is to try and keep the rural character. And taking out the stonewalls and widening this <br />12 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />