Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ONO: Okay. <br /> <br />KERN: And we’re just saying that they’re asking for that change, no. But the first, you know, with <br />the time extension, yes. <br /> <br />ONO: Okay, thank you. <br /> <br />KERN: No problem. Maija, oh, Commissioner Au. <br /> <br />AU: I have a question. <br /> <br />KERN: Okay, fire away. <br /> <br />AU: It’s something that I’d like to clarify. You know, when we started Ms. Song mentioned that, she <br />mentioned something that we cannot do. And I, you know, I could be wrong but the original <br />application was for five lots. Okay, so now we’re dropping it down to four lots. So now is this a <br />whole new application or are we on the same application? Because I know, I do understand it is an <br />amendment, we’re going to take out that one lot, okay. But is it a new application, or is it the same <br />application? But I do, like I said I do understand it’s an amendment. Maybe you can clarify that. <br /> <br />KERN: Anybody, Maija, you want to clarify that? <br /> <br />COTTLE: I can try to address that. So the request was for covering the five lots, because that’s what <br />the original rezone ordinance covered. The Planning Director with this revised bill is stating that her <br />recommendation is for these changes, which is the favorable time extension; and other conditions that <br />go along with that would only apply to the four lots that Mr. Higashi owns. So if this is, if the vote is, <br />if the motion passes, what would happen is we would send up a cover letter to the County Council that <br />says that the Planning Commission at their hearing voted to forward a favorable recommendation for <br />Condition C, unfavorable for Conditions H and I. We would forward this first page as the first page of <br />the bill which shows that it only applies to the four parcels, as well as the conditions that are <br />recommended in the orange or in the goldenrod. And so just to point out Condition C, if you read <br />Condition C of the goldenrod, it says “Final subdivision approval of the proposed consolidation and <br />resubdivision of the subject property shall be secured within five years from the effective date of this <br />amended ordinance.” So that time extension request is reflected in Condition C. That’s giving them <br />five more years. Then you’ll see Conditions H and I have not been amended because the Director is <br />not supporting that amendment. Is that clear? Does that help? <br /> <br />ONO: Okay. <br /> <br />KERN: Amy Self, do you want to -? <br /> <br />SELF: I think I can add some more explanation. This is, okay, I think the applicant, my understanding <br />is the applicant, the original application did not include five properties. It only included the four <br />properties. But when you’re going to amend an ordinance that already exists, you cannot change the <br />18 <br /> EXHIBIT E <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />