Laserfiche WebLink
title of the ordinance. The original title of this rezone ordinance included all five properties. They all <br />got rezoned at the same time cause it was originally one property. And so you cannot, you cannot take <br />one of those properties out of the title of that ordinance, cause you’re not downzoning a property. So <br />they’re all still under the same rezone ordinance. However, the amendments to the conditions that <br />you’re doing right now do not affect that one parcel, the Parcel 3, because they’re not developing <br />Parcel 3. So the conditions are only as they apply to the four parcels that they’re developing. If you <br />just, you know how a rezone ordinance or an ordinance in itself looks when it passes? That’s what this <br />is. You’re just amending something that has already been passed previously. And so you can’t change <br />the original title of the ordinance, cause otherwise if you left that Parcel 3 out of the title, it wouldn’t <br />have a zoning any more. So you don’t want it to lose its zoning. But at the same time you want to <br />make certain that these conditions are not affecting Parcel 3. That was just to clarify that the <br />conditions are only as to the parcels that are going to be developed. And that’s all that was applied for <br />to begin with. I hope that helps. <br /> <br />KERN: Commissioner Domingo? <br /> <br />DOMINGO: Yeah, but what about the ownership of Parcel 3? <br /> <br />SELF: Well, there’s nothing that’s being done to Parcel 3. There’s, none of the amendments to the <br />conditions affect Parcel 3. So now if later on they get a trustee for the Trust who can sign on behalf of <br />the Trust and they want to do something to Parcel 3, then the same process would apply to Parcel 3. <br />They would apply for whatever changes they want. If they wanted to, let’s say they wanted to change <br />the zoning of their property, then they would apply for change of zoning. I guess they’d have to then <br />amend this zoning so that it would reflect that they all have the same zoning. <br /> <br />DOMINGO: I recall an earlier conversation that they had approval of the ownership of Parcel 3 in the <br />original, time of the original rezoning. Am I right? <br /> <br />SELF: That I couldn’t, I don’t know. <br /> <br />SONG: No. <br /> <br />SELF: I don’t know if the applicant or Sandy -. <br /> <br />SONG: No, it was never -. Somehow it was amended. <br /> <br />SELF: Oh, it was amended originally? <br /> <br />SONG: It was amended. <br /> <br />DOMINGO: I don’t know -. I heard some kind of conversation that they had approval of, concurrence <br />from the owner of Parcel 3. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Well, -. <br /> <br />19 <br /> EXHIBIT E <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />