My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-02-02 Windward Transcript Graphic
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2012
>
2012-02-02 Windward Transcript Graphic
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2012 3:35:29 PM
Creation date
4/3/2012 3:35:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HIGASHI: Yeah, we had no interest in that property. Because of the size and shape it was not <br />economically feasible for us, and it was in a trust. So our acquisition was strictly from Finance <br />Factors. <br /> <br />YEH: And I think what BJ has probably correctly done is, you know, tried not to cut it out of the <br />proposed extension just so that there’s no derogation or interference with whatever rights that parcel <br />has. I mean in theory the Council could as with any other similar issue rezone or extend the time for <br />the rezoning for the four parcels we’re talking about, cut out that road lot because it’s not a formal part <br />of this application. Then, of course, you know, the time extension wouldn’t apply to that parcel so -. I <br />mean that’s always, that’s a possibility also. But we just don’t want that kind of interfering with the <br />ability of these four parcels to move forward. <br /> <br />KERN: Commissioner Domingo <br /> <br />DOMINGO: Should the conditions be approved, how would you folks handle the floodplain and the <br />building of that specific structure? <br /> <br />KERN: What I’d like to do is kind of separate this lot issue out first. <br /> <br />DOMINGO: Okay. <br /> <br />KERN: We’re kind of going to make it a two-part ordeal, if you will. <br /> <br />DOMINGO: Okay, sure. <br /> <br />KERN: Would you mind holding that question? <br /> <br />DOMINGO: I’ve got no problem, I’ve got no problem. <br /> <br />KERN: Okay, thank you. Any other questions regarding this lot issue? .Lot 3 is in this application. <br /> <br />YEH: Well, that’s a very good question. Because when Graphic Imagines applied for the rezoning or <br />the time extension, I should say, it did not include Lot 3. <br /> <br />KERN: Okay. And the Lot 3 got put in there for the reason of -? <br /> <br />YEH: I think the Planning Department felt it would be a good idea to kind of include it as part of the <br />analysis. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: It’s part of the original ordinance -. <br /> <br />YEH: Right, that’s correct. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: In the description, which is why it’s part of this. It’s not that the applicant asked <br />for it. It’s that if you look at the title of the ordinance and the description and the references to the <br />various parcels, it’s included. <br />8 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.