Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 RECYCLING, BIOCONVERSION, AND MARKETS <br />EXHIBIT 4 -4 <br />Factors Affecting Curbside Recycling Costs <br />Estimated Cost <br />Program Feature Increase or Decrease <br />Commingled collection 20 to 35% decrease <br />Less than weekly collection 20 to 40% decrease <br />Mandatory recycling 10 to 25% decrease <br />Long program history 10 to 25% decrease <br />Automating collection 5 to 15% increase <br />Adding variable rates 10 to 20% increase <br />Adding new materials 15 to 35% increase <br />Source: California Integrated Waste Board. 2002. Curbside <br />Recycling, the Next Generation: A Model for Local <br />Government Recycling and Waste Reduction. Accessed at <br />http: / /www.ciwmb.ca.gov/ publications /default.asp ?pubid =969 <br />Depending on the types of issues discussed above, the cost of curbside recycling could vary <br />significantly. A curbside recycling only system, without garbage or yard waste, but <br />including material processing and marketing, would require development of significant <br />collection infrastructure and would probably cost $20 to $30 per household per month. The <br />costs would likely be significantly less if the service was combined with curbside garbage <br />and /or green waste collection. <br />4.5.3 Residential Curbside Collection and Processing of Green Waste <br />In this option, the County would collect green waste from single - <br />family residents or contract with a private collection firm for the <br />service. The choice of County collection versus private collection <br />would need to be made with State contracting laws in mind. <br />In this type of program, materials are typically collected in bags or <br />plastic bins provided by residents or the local government. While <br />some systems are used for bulk collection without containers, <br />these are typically only used seasonally in the fall for leaf <br />collection9_ Types of bags or containers and associated advantages <br />and disadvantages of each type of container follow. <br />Plastic bags. Relatively inexpensive, convenient, but a significant problem for processors <br />because the cost of removing all plastic from the organics results either in contaminated <br />low - quality feedstock, extremely high -cost bag removal methods, or both. Grass in <br />plastic bags can go anaerobic and become odorous when opened at the compost facility. <br />Most green waste collection programs now prohibit collection of green waste in plastic <br />bags. <br />9 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1994. Composting Yard Trimmings and Municipal Solid Waste. Accessed at <br />http: / /www.epa.gov /osw /conserve /rrr /composting /pubs /cytmsw.pdf <br />December 2009 4 -17 <br />