2012-07-19 Leeward Exh A - Kohanaiki

Home

gives you in terms of the Huliko‘a use from your property, because my understanding is that the State wants to limit direct access. You might be allowed to get a right-in/right-out, but you wouldn’t get a full four-way intersection there, because they want to limit a number of intersections. So if you have long range plans, you probably need to be looking at what the timelines are for other development in the area, where -. I’m not sure where the County is on the Mid Level Road, because we don’t have funding for the next section. But you need to be coordinating primarily with State DOT because the access to Queen K is going to be your big issue. LEE: Thank you. BOWMAN: Thank you, Director. Are there any other questions from the Commissioners? If there are none, you may be seated, thank you. Is there anyone else who came in that would like to testify for Agenda Item No. 2, Kohanaiki Shores? Hearing none, would the applicants like to return? Thank you. LIM: Thank you, Madam Chair. What we will do now is to have Roy Takemoto pick up on some of the finer details of the project and the project issues and, hopefully, respond to the concerns of the National Park Service. Thank you. BOWMAN: Thank you. TAKEMOTO: Okay, I’ll be discussing three points. First, maybe, since the testimony is fresh, let me just respond first to the testimony. So regarding the Lee property, we are required by Condition No. 5 to extend Huliko‘a to the northern boundary. Jeff, you’ve got your pointer thing? DARROW: Sure. TAKEMOTO: Thank you. So what that means is we’ll be providing an easement that will connect to this boundary here that would extend Huliko‘a to enable it to continue on. And this is the Lee property here. As an easement, should the Lee property not like where it’s stubbing out to their property based on their future master planning, that easement would allow them to relocate it to the location that best suits them. So there will be an easement created that could be re-locatable. So that’s point No. 1 that I’d like to bring up. Point No. 2, on the response to the National Park Service, and we have a proposed condition where in fact we would accept their point that there needs to be further mitigation. And the condition that we would like to propose reads as follows: Implement best management practices engineered to detain and filter pollutant-carrying first-flush stormwater or spills to supplement drywells, for example, bioswales or similar measures, and that these measures be appropriate to the potential impact to anchialine ponds and the level of traffic, meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works. So if this is acceptable, this is a condition that we would like to propose as an addition to what’s in the staff report. BOWMAN: You have that in writing for our staff? TAKEMOTO: Yeah, uh huh. BOWMAN: Thank you. 6 EXHIBIT A