My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-06-07 Windward Transcript Hegarty
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2012
>
2012-06-07 Windward Transcript Hegarty
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 11:38:45 AM
Creation date
9/19/2012 11:38:40 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GALIMBA: I’m deferring to my secretary, 1966. <br /> <br />ONO: So since 1966 nothing has developed in the center? There’s been no development, there’s no <br />commercial development anywhere? <br /> <br />GALIMBA: Not at this point. It was, we started down closer to the sub -, bottom of the subdivision <br />simply because we put a Longhouse and community area there. And as the community grew, our <br />plans were to have a school, or police substation, or a fire station in that particular location, and a store, <br />or other commercial development there as the community grew. So since 1966 it has been in our <br />covenants to develop in the future. <br /> <br />ONO: Thank you. <br /> <br />KERN: Thank you. I have a question. Last time, the previous meeting that we were here I asked, <br />specifically asked you if you had any plans or if you, excuse me, if the Board had any plans to do any <br />commercial development on those set aside parcels. And I was told by you that you did not. You had, <br />there was the intention to do recreation facilities, as you had just said maybe a fire station, police <br />station, school, park, etc. But it was stated that there was no plan for any commercial development. I <br />just wanted to clarify that -. <br /> <br />GALIMBA: Okay, I respectfully disagree with your assessment. My testimony was that I did not <br />have immediate plans, that we had planned for development in the future. But also you have to take <br />into consideration the fact that future development has planning, and our plans are not to go forth with <br />any development with disregard to the traffic problems. We have a lot of people in our association. <br />And you -. <br /> <br />KERN: Okay, just, we have to stick to the question. <br /> <br />GALIMBA: Let’s go back to the minutes before you crucify me up here because -. <br /> <br />KERN: Oh, I’m not. I just, I remember asking that. Cause that was one of my questions -- was, well, <br />if you guys are planning for, you know, specifically to do that. That’s why I asked that. And it was <br />stated at the time that it was -. <br /> <br />GALIMBA: Yeah, well, the recollection is flawed, sir. <br /> <br />KERN: Agree to disagree. <br /> <br />GALIMBA: Thank you. <br /> <br />KERN: I’ll look at the minutes. Any other questions? Seeing none at this time, thank you very much. <br />You may have a seat. One more person signed up to testify, and I cannot read their last name. The <br />first name looks like it’s Norman. Can I get you to please raise your right hand. Do you swear to tell <br />the truth today before the Windward Planning Commission? <br /> <br />NAKANO: I do. <br /> 15 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.