My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-11-19 Board of Ethics minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2012
>
2012-11-19 Board of Ethics minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2012 1:55:30 PM
Creation date
12/12/2012 1:52:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />a. Petition No. 2012-03: Further informal hearing of petition alleging violations <br />of Section 2-83 of the Ethics Code when County employees are allowed to <br />attend union meetings, on County time, in which political campaigning takes <br />place. <br /> <br /> <br />MR. DILL: This is the third continuation, I believe, on this matter. Counsel, you had <br />provided us with the collective bargaining agreements. It was made clear in SHOPO and <br />I believe the Fire Fighter’s Union, in the nature of that— <br /> <br />MS. SCHOEN: I provided the Board with collective bargaining agreements of UPW, <br />also Fire Fighter’s Association, and police officer’s (SHOPO) bargaining units. I also <br />provided the Board with two opinions from the State Ethics Commission as well as a <br />Hawai‘i Supreme Court case entitled HGEA v. Casupang. I also provided the Board <br />with a letter from our HR director, basically submitting all the CBAs. <br /> <br />MR. DILL: Good. Board members, any comments? I’d like to point out for the record <br />that this Board has no jurisdiction over the unions or union activities. That being said, <br />County employees who are subject to the County Code of Ethics and are union employees <br />and union members must abide by County Charter to the County Code of Ethics. In this <br />case, we’re looking at Article 15, Section 2-83, fair treatment, specifically item 2- <br />83(b)(3), using County equipment or other facilities for private business or campaign <br />purposes. Comments? <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: I have a comment. I agree that this Board has no jurisdiction over the <br />union, and in all the evidence and all the documents that were given to us, there was no <br />pre-notice to any of the employees or those that were going to be in attendance that these <br />were going to be meetings political in nature rather than informational in nature. And so <br />it’s hard to—I don’t think we can say that employees violated the Code of Ethics. To say <br />whether or not this was right or wrong with regards to the Code of Ethics, it’s a very <br />difficult area to make a judgment on. That’s all for right now. <br /> <br />MR. HISASHIMA: Clarification please, attorney. Section 8, Education and Information <br />Meetings from UPW. Apparently the meeting that was held, was it a union function or <br />the County’s function? <br /> <br />MS. SCHOEN: My understanding is it’s a union informational and educational meeting. <br /> <br />MR. HISASHIMA: Okay. Can you clarify for me—I have a scale which indicates paid, <br />non-paid, work, straight time, overtime. “Paid – not worked.” Can you clarify what <br />“not worked” means? <br /> <br />MS. SCHOEN: Glen, where are you looking at? UPW Unit 01? <br /> <br />MR. HISASHIMA: No, I think this is the County’s one, because it has certain areas <br />where it says like “paid,” “premium,” “overtime,” “straight time.” And there’s a place <br />that’s called “paid – not worked.” So I need to know what does “not worked” mean. <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.