|
FUKE: If there are specific technical questions on the traffic, fortunately, we do have the traffic
<br />engineer, Bruce Witcher, who prepared the traffic studies for both this project, as well as the next
<br />one that’s going to come up before you. I’d like to just kind of preface by saying that first of all in
<br />terms of the park site selection, I mean, you know this has been going on for like five or six years,
<br />and the community at that time was really like at a loss, you know, trying to find where would be
<br />the appropriate location for a park site. And quite frankly, Councilmember Hoffmann had some
<br />heartburns about this area because one of the, expressing the same kind of concern that one of the
<br />testifiers stated, specifically how can children, you know, riding their bicycles or walking to that
<br />area, you know, safely come to that area. But I think that after they looked at all of the available
<br />properties in that area, I think the decision was like, it’s really like no choice, you know; if you want
<br />a park, that’s probably, and given the landowners and landownership tenure in that area, that’s
<br />probably like the only location. So it’s not like the ideal location but, you know, given the situation,
<br />that probably might be the only option. Waikoloa Mauka, you know, the owners of the property on
<br />the south side of Waikoloa Road, they said that they were willing to also provide land because they
<br />own land like above of the Stables, and then the community said, well, it’s a little bit too far
<br />because we want it close to the community, etc. etc., and so finally, long story being short, I’m
<br />repeating myself, it was kind of like that area. It was kind of too bad that some of the testifiers, you
<br />know, did not necessarily participate, you know, like in those discussions; but if you talk to other
<br />people, then regrettably they are not here but, you know, some of the participants at that time would
<br />probably, you know, kind of attest what I’m sharing with you right now. I do have an article that
<br />was published in the North Hawai‘i News, and it appeared in July 2011, and it was a presentation of
<br />this plan here, you know, with the community. And so it, you know, and this plan was prepared
<br />only after a number of, like, after trying to figure out where the park is going to be and how we are
<br />going to fund it and so on and so forth, and so then we came up with this master plan. So prior to
<br />submittal, you know, we kind of like had it vetted by whoever was attending, you know, with the
<br />community at that time, and overall the community, the sense I got, and I’ll make a copy of this
<br />article for you, it showed that they were relatively supportive of the overall concept.
<br />
<br />The other thing related to traffic, too, is like, you know, in addition to the traffic study being done,
<br />this project was also vetted from a traffic standpoint by the South Kohala Traffic Committee, and if
<br />you’ll notice, their comment, they said that they conditionally supported the application; the
<br />condition being making sure that, you know, there are certain things that are taken care of, and a lot
<br />of the things, a lot, I think almost all of the recommendations or the conditions suggested by the
<br />South Kohala Traffic Committee are embodies in one form or another as part of your conditions.
<br />
<br />The last point I’d like to make is, maybe this is really like a question to be directed to Mr. Emler,
<br />but there is this condition that states that access to the property from Waikoloa Road and Paniolo
<br />Avenue, including the provision of sight distance, channelization, etc., etc. shall meet with the
<br />approval of the Department of Public Works; my question is like when you look at sight distance
<br />requirement, do you necessarily look at like where the proposed intersection is going to exit to
<br />Paniolo Avenue and Waikoloa Road, or do you also take into consideration existing driveways like
<br />existing accesses prior to telling the applicant this is where, you know, this is where it’s acceptable.
<br />
<br />GIFFIN: Ki, will you come up to the lectern and address that?
<br />
<br />EMLER: Well, we, too, had quite a concern about this development because of the existing
<br />accesses for Waikoloa Highlands Shopping Center across the street; they’ve already got two full
<br />movement accesses there on Paniolo Drive. They’ve got two, or they’ve got one full movement on
<br />Waikoloa Road as well and then one right-in/right-out on Waikoloa Road; so there is some relief for
<br />18
<br />EXHIBIT A
<br />
<br />
|