Laserfiche WebLink
Commission today is the change – I hope I’m going the right way, one moment – is a change of <br />zone that affects approximately 14.6 acres, which is the mustard colored area. While I did, we did <br />make reference and have been speaking about the proposed park that could be dedicated to the <br />County of Hawai‘i, as well as possible discussions with the church for the use of those properties, <br />that is really distinct and separate from the request that is currently before you. They are not tied in <br />together, meaning that approval of this change of zone is, or dedication of the park site is not <br />subject to getting an approval for the change of zone; it is independent. So I just wanted to make <br />sure that’s clear. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Commissioners, any questions? Lani. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: I do. I’m sorry again, because I seem to be a little confused. I know the testifier <br />testified that their condominium was in the V on that road. So what I’d like to know is, where is the <br />south, about, the south boundary of the whole lot? Is that depression, the floodway that we were <br />talking about, so it actually is more to the north? Where is the northern boundary about? <br /> <br />ARAI: The northern boundary I think is somewhere in this vicinity here. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Okay, okay, so somewhere there. So basically, the top of the developed area would <br />kind be by the V. <br /> <br />FUKE: Actually, as shown on, you know, that map -. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Right. <br /> <br />FUKE: The proposed access would probably be close to where the existing project, or existing <br />condominiums are -. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Okay. <br /> <br />FUKE: Maybe if you can go back again to the visual, the photograph rather. They are right there. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Okay. So that would be the existing -. And then the park would be -. <br /> <br />FUKE: The park would be like on the right hand quadrant of that map. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Okay, that’s, thank you for the visual. Thanks. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Anyone else have questions of Mr. Fuke? Hearing none, thanks, Sidney. Daryn, did you <br />want to go over the amendment to the Planning Director’s recommendation, I and J? <br /> <br />ARAI: Sure. Let me summarize the amendment. The amendment to proposed Condition I, the <br />area, or the language highlighted specifically in yellow and underscored is the new language that we <br />wish to include in the currently constructed proposed condition. And the purpose of that is to make <br />it absolutely clear that the restrictions to movements onto the subject property from Paniolo Avenue <br />is not only limited or restricted to construction vehicles; it shall also apply to regular vehicles, like, <br />for example, once the development is complete and the public can visit the property, it will be <br />restricted to right-in and right-out movements only until such time a specific left-turn lane is <br />21 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />