|
installed by the applicant in Paniolo Avenue. And only at that point when it’s constructed, will the
<br />condition then allow left-turn movements into the subject property.
<br />
<br />GIFFIN: So if I understand this proposed condition, it is only for right-in/right-out movement.
<br />
<br />ARAI: For, right, it is only for right-in and right-out movements during the period prior to the
<br />installation of a dedicated left-turn lane.
<br />
<br />GIFFIN: Okay, thank you. Commissioners, do you have that in front of you, and do you have any
<br />questions? Hearing none, Daryn, would you go on to the proposed new Condition J?
<br />
<br />ARAI: Sure. Now water system that services all of Waikoloa Village is a private water system; it
<br />is not a system that’s supported or managed by the County Department of Water Supply. That
<br />being said, the new Condition J is to make it absolutely clear that the applicant will be obligated to
<br />work with this private water company to make sure that the water system and possibly even sources
<br />in the area are adequate to support the proposed commercial development. And the condition
<br />provides that assurance, as well as identifies three distinct requirements that were identified by the
<br />Department of Water Supply in its memorandum in response to this application. And again, those
<br />three items include designing and constructing a water system that meets their requirements – and
<br />I’m sorry, I’m paraphrasing – No. 2, to submit construction plans for their review and approval, and
<br />to pay basically an inspection fee.
<br />
<br />GIFFIN: Commissioners, any questions of Daryn regarding the new proposed Condition J? So, is
<br />it, Daryn, is it in lieu of what was presented, or is it in addition to J?
<br />
<br />ARAI: It is a new Condition J, with all subsequent conditions to be re-alphabetized.
<br />
<br />GIFFIN: Any other questions of staff? Daryn.
<br />
<br />ARAI: I just was consulting with the Department of Public Works representative. If you were to
<br />refer to your recommendation report Condition, the existing Condition J, which speaks directly to,
<br />“A Flood Study shall be submitted, meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works,
<br />prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval”; he is asking that a similar language as contained within the
<br />existing Condition H where at the very end of Condition H it says, “as recommended in the
<br />Department of Public Works’ memo dated October 4, 2012,” he would like the same passage
<br />attached to the current Condition J regarding the flood study. So, again, I’ll read the language as he
<br />is recommending: “A Flood Study shall be submitted, meeting with the approval of the Department
<br />of Public Works, prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval, as recommended in the Department of
<br />Public Works’ memo dated October 4, 2012.” I will at this point ask for the Director if she has any
<br />objections or concerns regarding the proposal. With that being said, we would recommend that that
<br />revision be included in the current Condition J, which, if you adopt the proposed amendment we
<br />proposed earlier, it would be the new Condition K.
<br />
<br />GIFFIN: Okay, Commissioners, we’ve heard from six testifiers today, generally residents that are
<br />from Waikoloa. We’ve heard from Department of Public Works and, of course, our staff. In
<br />addition to all of that, we’ve heard from the applicant. Do you have any questions of any of these
<br />people? I’m happy to call back any of the public testifiers, if you would like to hear from them
<br />again. If there is anyone from the public who didn’t have an opportunity to sign up earlier, I’m
<br />happy to accommodate you. If not, Commissioners, any questions? And remember we have two
<br />22
<br />EXHIBIT A
<br />
<br />
|