My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CAFR 2012 Final with Opinion (2)
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Finance Administration
>
Audit Reports
>
Prior Years
>
2012
>
CAFR 2012 Final with Opinion (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2013 9:21:49 AM
Creation date
1/24/2013 9:13:08 AM
Metadata
Document Relationships
CAFR 2012 Final with Opinion
(Original Version)
Path:
\Finance Department\Finance Administration\Audit Reports\Prior Years\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• A decrease in intergovernmental revenue of$6.2 million (11 percent). The most significant <br /> causes of the decrease were due to declines in public safety operating grants($3.1 million) <br /> and in health, education and welfare capital grants($3.0 million). <br /> • A net decrease of$15.7 million(7 percent)in total expenditures for the general fund which is <br /> primarily the result of the County's decision to forgo the employer contributions relating to <br /> the pre-funding of its postemployment benefits other than pensions that it had made for the <br /> previous four fiscal years. <br /> The fund balance of the County's capital projects fund decreased by$20.5 million during the <br /> current fiscal year. The decrease is primarily due to the combined total of the fund's main <br /> revenue source of long-term debt financing,which consists of state revolving fund loan proceeds <br /> ($4.6 million), intergovernmental revenue($30.0 million), and transfers in($3.7 million) being <br /> less than capital and debt service expenditures($59.3 million)for the current fiscal year. <br /> Although the fund balance of the capital projects fund was $29.5 million at the end of the current <br /> fiscal year and the total unrestricted portion was $2.2 million,the unassigned portion of the <br /> unrestricted fund balance was a negative$10.2 million. This was due to a change in the County's <br /> procedures regarding the issuance of bonds, in that the County defers the issuance of bonds until <br /> the funds are actually needed even though the project will be allotted so that work may begin and <br /> will instead issue Bond Anticipation Notes. As of June 30, 2012,these notes are reflected as a <br /> current liability in the fund because the legal steps regarding the issuance of the bonds to pay off <br /> these notes have not been completed at the time the audited financial statements are being issued. <br /> The debt service funds consist of the Bond Redemption Fund and the Interest Fund. These funds <br /> have combined total fund balances of$26.2 million, all of which is restricted for the payment of <br /> debt service. The net decrease in the combined fund balances during the current year in the debt <br /> service funds was$0.5 million(2 percent). <br /> Proprietary funds. The County's proprietary funds provide the same type of information found <br /> in the government-wide financial statements,but in more detail. <br /> Unrestricted net assets of the Kulaimano Elderly Housing Project(Kulaimano)at the end of the <br /> year amounted to $564,659, and the unrestricted net deficit of the Ouli Ekahi Affordable Housing <br /> Project(Ouli Ekahi) amounted to $108,741. The net assets for Kulaimano decreased by$22,032 <br /> and the net assets for Ouli Ekahi increased by$35,312. Other factors concerning the finances of <br /> these two funds have already been addressed in the discussion of the County's business-type <br /> activities. <br /> GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS <br /> Differences between the original budget and the final amended budget were primarily the result <br /> of a$11.0 million increase in appropriations,most of which(94%) is due to increases in the <br /> appropriations for capital and operating grants and contributions. <br /> Differences between the final budget and the actual(budgetary basis)resulted in$3.9 million less <br /> revenues than expected and$26.3 million less expenditures than appropriated. This is primarily <br /> due to the following factors: <br /> • $5.3 million negative variance in intergovernmental revenue,which was made up almost <br /> entirely of the decrease in federal grants. <br /> -22 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.