Laserfiche WebLink
ARAI: I don’t see a real issue regarding asking for a progress report at the one-year mark. Again, I <br />personally think it’s reasonable. And I really don’t know what’s going to come of the applicant’s <br />consultation with the State Department of Transportation. I’m also keenly aware that we’re actually <br />holding this hearing in a State Building, so I’ll kind of leave it as that. But I just haven’t thought <br />through whether we should include it as a specific condition. I mean if it’s really just a report at the <br />one-year mark, we’ll keep that in our records and we’ll make, contact the applicant at the one-year <br />mark if you so desire. <br /> <br />ONO: It’s not a -. <br /> <br />KERN: Would you use your microphone. <br /> <br />ONO: Oh, I’m sorry, I’m sorry. I was just countering the idea that we have the applicant face us again <br />in a year. <br /> <br />KERN: Yeah, makes sense. Any other discussion? I’ll put in my two cents. State DOT is slow at <br />best. I think giving them two years make sense. I think it would make sense to get a progress report, a <br />request for that, it’s not unreasonable, the other issues we discussed at the other meeting when we <br />actually approved the permit. So I think we should move forward, give them the time extension for the <br />two years, ask for the progress report. And usually the way I look at it, if the applicants are making <br />their best effort to get it done, you know, we go with that. If they are not, that’s another story. In this <br />case, it appears that the applicant has been, so I’d support the two-year time extension. Any other <br />discussion? Seeing none, I guess could we ask the motion maker to add that, is that what we’re <br />supposed to do for the progress report? <br /> <br />DARROW: Are we looking at an added condition or we’re just looking as -? <br /> <br />KERN: Okay, well, let’s see if the motion maker would be willing to amend the motion to ask for a <br />one-year time extension as well. Would you, Commissioner Au, one-year progress report? <br /> <br />AU: One-year progress report within the two years? <br /> <br />ONO: Correct. <br /> <br />KERN: Yeah, so right now he’s asking for the two-year time extension; and then you made the motion <br />to approve that. So you could add there that we could get a progress report in a year from now, <br />basically it would be a letter saying here’s where I’m at with the State DOT. <br /> <br />AU: Yes, yes. I’d like to change my motion and amend the amended motion with, I guess, conditions, <br />to add this condition to, for the applicant to send a progress report within one year of the two-year <br />extension. <br /> <br />KERN: So at one year. Daryn? <br /> <br />ARAI: So you would like to see as a special condition? I guess what I was mentioning earlier that you <br />can just act on the request for a time extension and direct the Office to make contact with the applicant <br /> 12 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br /> <br />