2012-08-02 Windward Transcript Poloke Farms

Home

for a progress report at the one-year mark. So I personally don’t think a condition is necessary. We’ll just make a note to file -. KERN: Okay. ARAI: And we’ll make contact with the applicant at one year. KERN: That is -. Ivan? TORIGOE: Yeah, it depends. You know, if you were going to put that additional condition in at this point, I would suggest that you have a motion to amend the motion that’s already on the floor. Or if there’s clear agreement you can do that by consensus on the record, but it has to be really clear. You know, it’s a matter of clarity. Because if it is a condition, then it’s right there in writing; and everybody is noticed of it. And if you just leave it to the staff and, you know, you can trust the staff probably to do that. But it’s kind of a matter of degree of clarity and certainty for you. KERN: I’ll leave that up -. Any discussion on that from Commissioners on whether we want to just direct the Department to get that progress report or we want to actually make it a condition? AU: I -. KERN: Commissioner Au? AU: Thank you, Mr. Chair. For the neighbor’s sake, I think we should hold the applicant accountable, rather than having the Planning Department contact the applicant. You know, I’d prefer having the applicant contact the Planning Department as the progress goes on, within one year. That’s what I would like to see. And would that have to be a condition or would that just, would that be an amendment? DARROW: Commissioner Au, what we would request is that we would add a new condition, maybe a new Condition No. 15, stating that the applicant submit a progress report. We can actually put a date, right, today’s date, one year from now. ARAI: One year from the amendment -? DARROW: Today’s date? ARAI: Yeah. DARROW: One year from the amendment approval. Would that be something that’s -? AU: Yes, that would be good. DARROW: Okay, so we’ll draft a condition for that right now. 13 EXHIBIT A