Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – June 17, 2013 <br />for what is wildlife and when they started out – they started <br />out saying it is said to mean, you know, any member of a <br />non-domesticated species of animal kingdom and game <br />mammals and game birds living in the wild in non- <br />domesticated state and at the Kailua-Kona meeting, the <br />public meeting that I went to on March 28, it was brought to <br />them – who’s the [unclear – sounds like “stet”] who’s this <br />entity? And they couldn’t give a definitive answer. But, <br />nevertheless, if you talk to the DLNR’s – the department’s <br />biologist – I have in the past and they consider wildlife as <br />every animal kingdom/species whether domesticated at one <br />time or not – which is born in habitats in the wild, period. <br />And, I know there’s people that speak to me that they’re are <br />opposed about this language because it gives DLNR the <br />right to chose what lives and dies, at their discretion. And <br />who, and the way of their wording. Another subject matter in <br />this 13 - 124 is the crop damage nuisance and threat to <br />human health and safety permits. They’re basically giving <br />the department the authorization, without public input, to <br />take action however they need to see put. And that’s a <br />problem I hear from the public. But number one is the <br />penalty issue – that they want to amend this 124 with – the <br />public’s up-in-arms with – they don’t even enforce the laws <br />that are on the books right now – and now they’re adding <br />more penalties and heavier penalties directed to indigenous, <br />injurious, and introduced wildlife. There’s also talk with this <br />amendment change – the 124 – they have an exist list – and <br />it lists the injurious wildlife in Hawaii. And the public – at the <br />th <br />meeting in Kona on March 28 and you hear talk on the <br />street is – they want to know who specifically in the <br />department decides which species are injurious wildlife. And <br />they really won’t give a specific person – they just say the <br />th <br />department. And it was also put to ‘em on March 28 and <br />you hear people talking about it on the streets - why are not <br />wild cats included on this same list? And, the department <br />representatives at the time – at the public hearing on March <br />th <br />28 – responded by saying that cats are not considered <br />wildlife. And it’s common communication between the <br />hunters in the district that I live in – District 9 – that wild dogs <br />and wild cats are a detriment to our natural resources and <br />why aren’t they included on this injurious list. And lastly, I’ll <br />let someone else jump in here, but there was issues brought <br />up with this amendment change on 124 is – they included <br />doves and pigeons as injurious wildlife. And there was a <br />gentleman named William Isaac that stood up and gave <br />th <br />public testimony on March 28 in Kona regarding the <br /> 16 <br /> <br />