Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Now getting rid of the 80-foot road widening or future roadway is great conceptually and you <br />can say, well, in the future we’re going to do plans and studies and so forth. But what if those <br />plans and studies say, well, the bridge to connect Nowelo to Lanikāula is going to cost us several <br />million dollars so it’s not feasible. Well, I mean, somehow they got enough money to build the <br />bridge for Nowelo which really goes nowhere and serves no purpose. So the idea is that if you <br />keep the 80-foot right-of-way on some kind of government documentation, they cannot later say, <br />well, we did the study and it’s not working to our benefit so we’re not going to put it in. So once <br />you get rid of the 80-foot roadway there’s nothing to keep them from committing to alleviating <br />traffic in that area. So, I mean, they can, you know -. Again, I’m not against the University. I’m <br />just against extra traffic down my roadway. And by getting rid of another major roadway that <br />could connect mauka-makai that could alleviate some traffic off of Mohouli with no <br />comprehensive plan currently in place to alleviate traffic on Mohouli, it just makes no sense to <br />me because you’re getting rid of an opportunity for the community to help improve traffic <br />congestion. So that would be my concern. It’s just not, they won’t have anything to hold them <br />to making sure something like that happens if you get rid of the 80-foot future roadway. <br /> <br />ISHIBASHI: Questions for the testifier? Okay, thank you. Okay, Commissioners, Agenda Item <br />No. 6 on the docket right now. What is the pleasure of the Commission? <br /> <br />MOSES: Chair? <br /> <br />ISHIBASHI: Yes, Commissioner Moses. <br /> <br />MOSES: You know, I hear what testifier Mr. Santiago is saying. And I, I am in support of <br />changing the zone for the University; but I am not, at this time, in support of deletion of the <br />proposed 80-foot right-of-way for that very reason that he stated. I understand that the <br />Department of Transportation will be requiring that they do environmental impact statements but <br />there is nothing that will hold the University to having to actually do something that will address <br />Mr. Santiago’s concern, as I’m sure other people who utilize that. So that’s just my feeling. <br /> <br />ISHIBASHI: Thank you, Commissioner Moses. Yeah, those who drive that road, yeah, you see <br />the traffic up Mohouli. It’s kind of, it’s one of the famous sign waiving locations. So you know <br />the traffic is there if you’ve got to waive signs. So it’s a good one. Commissioner Henkel, <br />please. <br /> <br />HENKEL: Yeah. If we leave the, or if the 80-foot right-of-way is left, that’s, that doesn’t <br />necessarily mean that there’s going to be a road built there, right? <br /> <br />ARAI: Because it’s prescribed on the zone district map, even though it may not follow that <br />specific alignment, any development in that area has to accommodate and maintain the <br />functionality of that alignment. It may not follow the precise alignment, but somehow the UH <br />will have to program in its development plans a connection from Komohana Street to Kumukoa <br />Street, basically implementing what that alignment is intending to accomplish, as shown on your <br />Zone District Maps. So in the future if it remains on the Zone District Map, we’re going to be <br />looking at seeing something hard and fast on the ground, in one way, shape or form. <br /> <br /> <br />13 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />