My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-09-26 Leeward Exh A - Leach
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2013
>
2013-09-26 Leeward Exh A - Leach
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2013 1:38:56 PM
Creation date
10/17/2013 1:38:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ROSS: There will be a front wall that’s elevated a foot above grade so water can pass underneath it; <br />so the problem with landscaping is not going to be an issue. So he will have all the way up to the <br />property boundary whether in the areas where the gate, there is a gate that’s open to allow access to <br />the property, obviously you can’t block that, but it looks to me like there might be room for possibly <br />two vehicles in front of the guest residence, and maybe the same in front of the proposed new <br />residence. So there might be three or four parallel parking slots along the frontage that could <br />possible be used, I mean I haven’t sat down and measured it, but that’s what just the first impression <br />seems to be. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Thank you. Daryn, did you want to add anything? <br /> <br />ARAI: I guess I’m just simply going to add that I understand the concerns about adequacy of <br />parking when you establish or create public accesses, because, you know, pedestrian movement and <br />vehicular parking go hand in hand in many ways. In this particular area we are dealing with a <br />subdivision that has pre-existed some of our current public access requirements. So in the best of <br />both worlds, true, we would look at adequacy of parking while providing for pedestrian movements <br />as well. But in this particular case, we do have a pre-existing situation and we cannot accommodate <br />both, so at least there are provisions for pedestrian access; unfortunately, it’s hard for us to provide <br />for parking as well. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Thank you. <br /> <br />COMMAND: Madam Chair? <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Bobby. <br /> <br />COMMAND: May I ask a question of staff? <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Yes. <br /> <br />COMMAND: Ki, do you know the width of the shoulder in that area? <br /> <br />EMLER: Let me see where I can find that. I didn’t record it, I should have, but -. My apology. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Did you have another question? <br /> <br />COMMAND: No, no, I’m just, I’m just looking for -. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: I know, I know. And the width becomes an issue at times. Jeff. <br /> <br />DARROW: To answer the last question, the right-of-way width is 40 feet, the pavement width is 21 <br />feet. So it appears that you are probably going to have anywhere between eight to ten feet on each <br />side. When we went down, when we had -. Let me just go forward here, this will give a little better <br />picture of what we are looking at in regards to the shoulders there. In regards to landscaping, as <br />mentioned, yeah, you can see certain areas, but in regards to the subject property it doesn’t look like <br />that would be an issue, if they are going to be putting the wall that they have mentioned. So it could <br />provide several parking spaces in the front along the subject property. I also, when we visited this <br />6 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.