My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-09-26 Leeward Exh A - Leach
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2013
>
2013-09-26 Leeward Exh A - Leach
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2013 1:38:56 PM
Creation date
10/17/2013 1:38:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
area for the site inspection, we actually parked on the mauka side of the road, which accommodated <br />our vehicle off the road. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Thank you, Jeff. Any other comments from Commissioners regarding this agenda item? <br />Mr. Hickcox. <br /> <br />HICKCOX: Madam Chair, there was a question raised by Mr. Darrow in reference to the handling <br />of waste water, not waste water, swimming pool water, should it have to be drained. <br /> <br />ROSS: Yeah, I spoke with Mr. Leach about this just this morning. It seems like there are two <br />options. In a normal situation, you can have drainage that meets the County Code in a slow <br />percolation situation, you know, like a 24-hour or 48-hour where you just, you know, don’t do it in <br />a hurry. An alternate to that would be actually have a truck come in and pump it out and truck it <br />away. So those are two options that come to mind immediately. We’ll do whatever is required by <br />the County, whatever the standards are. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: I think that was in response to the letter, right, Tommy, from Jojo Tanimoto that Jeff <br />spoke of earlier, and I think it is No. 3. So is there going to be any kind of statement in terms of <br />what is going to be required, Jeff? <br /> <br />DARROW: In speaking with Ki regarding this issue, it looks like this would be a situation that <br />would probably most likely fall under Department of Health, Clean Water Branch. And so our <br />standard condition that says that the applicant shall comply with all rules, laws and regulations -. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Yeah, uh huh. <br /> <br />DARROW: But the main concern, I believe, that the drafter of the letter was trying to make was <br />that we avoid the water going into the ocean. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Ocean. <br /> <br />DARROW: Yeah, so that’s the main thing is that if the Commission would like to entertain a <br />specific condition, we can draft up something, or if you feel that the current condition is sufficient -. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Jeff, what specifically, which No. is that in reference to? I can’t seem to find it. Oh, <br />yeah. Tommy, we go back to you. Is No. 12 on Page 8 specific enough to meet your concerns and <br />your questions? <br /> <br />HICKCOX: My concern dealt primarily with the answering of the question itself. I know that the <br />water usage and disposal issues are covered, and the addition of chlorine to the ocean is actually <br />prohibited, if I’m not mistaken. Correct me, if I’m wrong, Jeff. <br /> <br />DARROW: Unfortunately, I’m not sure about these things. In this particular area in our situation, <br />again, we were looking at the property that was quite a distance away from the shoreline, so we <br />weren’t as concerned in regards to this issue. Had it been something more -. And I believe Health <br />would have commented clearly in regards to that issue, had it been a shoreline parcel. <br /> <br />7 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.