2013-09-26 Leeward Exh B - Hualalai Partners

Home

there was a warranty deed that was agreed to by all of the partners at that time, committing them to work together in establishment of one proper access throughout the development area. Now, looking at the development plans, preliminary development plans for Hu Ko Pa, we have three access points: one going into Paulehia, and then two onto Hualālai Road. Would the applicant be amenable to an additional condition that access to your parcel is, to Hualālai Road, is contingent on the road infrastructure completion of Parcel 42? LIM: So you would require, potentially require that the access to the subject property be through the I guess through the extension of the Paulehia Street to Hualālai Road, as provided in the Hu Ko Pa zoning ordinance. BEAUDET: Yes. LIM: I think if it was up to us, we would probably agree to that. The reason for the pink addition to Hualālai Road was from Councilman Ford who said you are creating a cul-de-sac; so we said, okay, we’ll see if we can punch out another road. We prefer not to do that, but we would be willing to do that. To some degree we, the only reason why we can agree to do that for something that technically this applicant doesn’t own is because they are a family relation, they are not legally related but family related; so so long as that stays the same, I think we can commit to do that. BEAUDET: But with the additional widening of the right-of-way by 20 feet within the boundary of the applicant’s parcel, wouldn’t that improve your line of sight for an additional access to Hualālai? LIM: Possibly. We -. BEAUDET: With the exception of the water tank parcel, right, Parcel 30. LIM: Right, right, right. So we’ve done the study for the pink access to Hualālai, and I think it would just minimally be making it. And the question was whether that should be, you know, whether that was a smart idea or not. We think probably not. We think probably we would rather go through Hu Ko Pa, and make the connection at one place for both projects where it’s best suited. BEAUDET: So the analysis was done on the current situation or the improved situation? LIM: Current sight distance, I think, in that area. So we are not expecting too much change right at the one point, I think it’s mostly road widening; once you get up to this other area where the water tank is, you get more slope I guess off the road, so we don’t know whether the road widening is going to be more on the mauka side, which is less expensive than it is to fill on the makai side. BEAUDET: Thank you. GIFFIN: Commissioners, any other questions of the applicant? HICKCOX: I have one, and it’s just curiosity I guess. If this is approved, construction for both of these developments, are they going to take place simultaneously? LIM: I believe so. It’s – you guys can chime in – but one of the big things that is holding up the makai property is the mauka drainage improvements that would happen on this property. Now, if 11 EXHIBIT B