2013-09-26 Leeward Exh B - Hualalai Partners

Home

they don’t get this property approved, it may not be financially feasible to do all those improvements for the makai property. HICKCOX: Yeah, so I guess what I’m asking also is that the stub-out proposals and the tie-in proposals to the existing roadways, right, are all going to happen at just about the same time. L. BARRETT: To try and answer the question, I think that would be tough, it would be very difficult to do both of them simultaneously, but I think rather in phases it would have to be done. And Paulehia Street extension I believe on Hu Ko Pa, the phasing along that street would be Phase No. 1, just to connect Paulehia Street to Hualālai Road and to Puapuaanui. HICKCOX: Okay, thank you. GIFFIN: Commissioners, any other questions of the applicant. Tom. WHITTEMORE: And this might be something maybe to staff also, and you could provide some clarification of your intent but, staff, the applicant has already indicated that they are going to go into P.U.D., which is going to be more density in those lots, if they go through that. There would be I assume one remainder lot in there, right? Is that how the P.U.D. would work? ARAI: A planned unit development permit is to provide basically a series of variances in order to facilitate master planning of a proposed development. What that basically means is they cannot use a planned unit development to increase density; density is established by zoning, a P.U.D. cannot change that. What the P.U.D. is basically for is the zoning, if approved, would allow for a minimum 15,000-square foot residential lots. A P.U.D. would, if approved, could allow the applicant to reduce the minimum lot sizes, and the applicant is proposing down to 10,000 square feet. So it provides more of design flexibility as long as the overall density is not exceeded. WHITTEMORE: Okay, that’s my understanding, but my question then to you is, can the applicant come back in at a subsequent date after this is all done and request similar zoning on the remainder large parcel? That would increase density tremendously. ARAI: Yes, they can. Yes, they may. WHITTEMORE: Okay. So has the developer, this is my question then to the developer, have you put together a plan for your proposed P.U.D. that shows how the traffic circulation would be under the plan, because we are looking at something under really different assumptions now, and we know where you are going to go? So, you are waiving your head like no, does that mean that the same traffic, internal roadway will remain regardless? A. BARRETT: This is just a conceptual plan and an idea, but this represents our P.U.D. subdivision. We’ve come out with all our cards on the table. Here it is right here; we are asking for a rezoning, RS-15, and this is the P.U.D. concept. WHITTEMORE: So this design reflects the 10,000-square foot lots. A. BARRETT: Yes. And just to I guess add to your comment, this as a P.U.D. or cluster planned development, C.P.D., I’m not sure what the difference is between the two, but all the other, or most 12 EXHIBIT B