My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-07-24 KCDP Minutes Final
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Kona Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Minutes
>
2009 - 2015
>
2013
>
2013-07-24 KCDP Minutes Final
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2017 10:26:04 AM
Creation date
11/14/2013 9:06:50 AM
Metadata
Sticky Note
ID:
1
Text:
Appears to be a typo and should reflect June 26, 2013.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
36 We can not have the Planning Department stopping our growth. They need to learn to talk <br />37 planning. The County needs to find the money to complete these goals. <br />38 <br />ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS <br />39 <br />40 An appreciation document from the mayor to Matt Binder for serving on the Action Committee. <br />41 <br />42 Minutes of the Meeting of June 24, 2013. Motion to approve the minutes was made by Hiram <br />43 Rivera and seconded by Greg Ogin. Item 49 Alahou steet is not dedicated at this time, but has <br />44 received favorable recommendation from the Burial Council for modification to the buffer wall <br />45 to relocate it out of the right of way. Correct spelling Charles Flahertys name. Approved as <br />46 noted. <br />47 <br />48 No amendments to the Agenda. <br />49 <br />50 Terry Dunlap spoke on the issue of concurrency. Janice Palma-Glennies comments on <br />51 concurrency was distributed to all members of the action committee. Discussion continued with <br />52 the items listed on the concurrency map and their impact on development and the issuance of <br />53 certificates of occupancy. The County is working on the 5 year review of the CDP and we <br />54 would recommend that a sub-committee address this issue and make recommendations to the <br />55 Planning Director as to how to improve concurrency requirements. Bennett Mark also <br />56 commented on the problems of how concurrency is being interpreted. We are asking the action <br />57 committee to confirm your understandings on concurrency and to recommend changes if you are <br />58 so inclined to do so. <br />59 Hiram Rivera commented on existing conditions and problems to complete some existing <br />60 subdivisions. The timeline to develop these roads will take a long timeline, maybe over 10 <br />61 years. This can be a disaster to a small developer. <br />62 <br />63 Bo Kahui agreed with the problems facing developments as a result of concurrency. We are all <br />64 subject to the concurrency table where nothing is getting done. It is a hugh monster. <br />65 <br />66 Greg Ogin discussed which sub-committee would handle concurrency and the result was that it <br />67 would fit in land use and economic development and transportation. <br /> 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.