My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-07-24 KCDP Minutes Final
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Kona Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Minutes
>
2009 - 2015
>
2013
>
2013-07-24 KCDP Minutes Final
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2017 10:26:04 AM
Creation date
11/14/2013 9:06:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
68 Two or more sub-committtees can deal with the this topic as it applies to their speciality. This <br />69 was confirmed by Margaret Masunaga, Corporation Counsel. Elaine Fukushima volunteered her <br />70 committee and was joined by Hiram Rivera. <br />71 <br />72 A question was raised concerning whether a budget existed to hire a consultant. Bennett stated <br />73 that no money exists to hire a consultant. Greg thought we could see if any consultant would <br />74 offer his or her time to help Kailua-Kona and the CDP. <br />75 <br />76 Matt Binder suggestion to invite the past members of the CDP to join in the talks on <br />77 concurrency. The CDP exists because of the lack of infrastructure. He also said that <br />78 concurrency is the wedge to force the politicians to complete what we need for streets. <br />79 <br />80 Hiram said that concurrency needs to be done with realistically with growth. Terry agreed with <br />81 Hiram and noted that planning is not opposed to concurrency, rather it how concurrency is <br />82 implemented. Concurrency should not be a moratorium on development. Its current application <br />83 is forcing existing land owners to develop lands as they are zoned which encourages urban <br />84 sprawl. Planning is seeking your recommendation on how concurrency can best be implemented <br />85 and would appreciate the action committees imput on this item after research is complete. <br />86 <br />87 Matt Binder mentioned impact fees and how the county did not implement this process. <br />88 Discussion about project size followed. Project size and its impact on the streets was discussed. <br />89 <br />90 Aaron Nagata asked whether the action committee can meet more than once a month. Greg Ogin <br />91 feels that once a month is adequate. Sub-committee can contact planning to share information. <br />92 Information can be discussed by sending the information to Planning staff for distribution to all <br />93 committee members. Bennett noted that sub-committee members can meet as often as they need. <br />94 <br />BUSINESS OF COMMITTEE <br />95 <br />96 <br />COMMITTEE REPORTS <br />97 <br />98 1.Outreach Aaron Nagata <br />99 2.Economic Development and Housing - Elaine Fukushima <br /> 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.