My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-12-05 Windward Transcript - Ocean View
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2013
>
2013-12-05 Windward Transcript - Ocean View
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2014 10:07:31 AM
Creation date
1/13/2014 10:06:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ONO: Could I ask for a comment on the conditions being proposed? <br /> <br />NITCHE: What conditions are you talking about? <br /> <br />ONO: I’m sorry? <br /> <br />NITCHE: What conditions are you talking about? <br /> <br />ONO: Those. <br /> <br />NITCHE: I’d just like to add on No. 2 adequate signage too. The word “adequate” should be <br />put in front of that. A small sign if that they can’t see doesn’t work. <br /> <br />ONO: Excuse me, these are all proposals. So if you would hang on, I just want to hear his <br />response. <br /> <br />PEEBLES: Personally, personally I don’t feel that a traffic attendant is needed. However, if you <br />guys do, we will bring in a traffic attendant. I really would like you guys to come and see what <br />really exists there, if you could. But whatever you come up with, if you want a traffic attendant, <br />we’ll get a guy to stand there as a traffic attendant if you think that will solve the problem. Again, <br />the issue is not about people not knowing what they’re not supposed to. The issue is defiance of <br />the people telling them they have to. But, yes, whatever conditions you do we’ll work -. Because <br />this is a positive thing for our community and we’d like to keep it as much as possible. Thank <br />you. <br /> <br />ISHIBASHI: Okay, any further questions? <br /> <br />PEEBLES: Can I make one more statement. I think you guys have all read that letter. Legally <br />there’s an issue here in the fact that these are private roads. And now we’re getting into some <br />expense by hiring traffic attendants. If they’re going to be, I’ve got to think how we’re going to <br />do this. I’m going to look for volunteers because businesswise there’s not enough income to do <br />this. And I have, but we’ll figure out how to have one. Okay? But, again, the Ranchos Road <br />Committee at some point is going to have to give us a full authorization, which if you’ve read in <br />that letter, and work with us because it’s their roads. Now, frankly, we own more lots than any <br />of, than all of them combined in the committee. So I’m part of this too. But the committee is the <br />established representative; and we’re going to have to give, they’re going to have to give us <br />authorization to enforce this. You see where I’m going with this? I can’t do it without an <br />authorization, because then the liability is huge. So that’s going to be an issue for them to figure <br />out. <br /> <br />NITCHE: Speaking for the Road Maintenance Corporation, I’m sure we’ll be happy to do that. <br />We welcome the opportunity to work with you on this. We’ve tried to for several years and <br />we’ve just had a cold shoulder. We would have loved to have some input into this. We live <br />17 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.