Laserfiche WebLink
In response to Commissioner Andreae’s questions, Mr. Childs clarified the exact site within the <br />shopping center, and said that the construction work that was being performed there did not trigger <br />the requirement for a plan approval and hence no review by the Commission. <br /> <br />Neither the applicant nor his representative was present. There was no one from the public wishing <br />to testify in regard to this agenda item. <br /> <br />It was moved by Commissioner Kitchens, and seconded by Commissioner Stanbro, to send to the <br />Public Works Director a recommendation for approval of the sign permit application as submitted. <br />A roll call vote was taken and the motion carried with five ayes (Kitchens, Stanbro, Andreae, Au Hoy <br />and Burns) and three absent and excused (Akina, Bleck and Broderson). <br /> <br />2. Design review of a sign permit application for one proposed wall sign, one proposed <br />marquee sign, one ground sign and one directory sign for Hawaii Radiologic Associates, <br />Ltd. and The Queens Health Care Center Specialty Clinic. Applicant: Hawaii Radiologic <br />Associates LTD Corporation. Land Owner: Hawaii Radiologic Associates LTD <br />Corporation. TMK: 7-5-004:012. Located at the southeast corner of Kuakini Highway and <br />Ololi Road (former Kona Ranch House Restaurant). <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Childs informed the Commission that the applicant had since eliminated the ground sign on Ololi <br />Road from their application, and revised the content and lettering of the directory sign for the corner <br />of Kuakini Highway and Ololi Road. He described the three proposed signs, and said that they all <br />complied with the size limitations of the Sign Code, and that the materials also complied with the <br />design guidelines of the Sign Code and the Master Plan for Kailua-Kona. He urged the Commission, <br />however, that consideration be given to the fact that the directory sign would likely be unreadable to <br />motorists due to the small lettering size. <br /> <br />Commissioner Burns opined that the sign area limitation in the Sign Code was not fair for businesses <br />with a long name, such as this applicant, who were forced to reduce the letter size in order to comply <br />with the code. She noted that the Commission could make an effectual recommendation to the Public <br />Works Director to allow a larger sign through a variance to accommodate a legible lettering size, had <br />such variances been issued administratively as opposed to the current procedure where the County <br />Council renders its decision at public hearings. She also pointed out that an unidentifiable sign could <br />actually become a traffic hazard. The Commissioners discussed how to improve the legibility of the <br />directory sign. Their suggestions included abbreviating the name on the sign and/or applying for a <br />variance to enlarge the sign area so that the lettering could be at least nine-inch high, which is the <br />maximum allowable height for the Kailua Village special design district. <br /> <br />The applicant’s representatives, Matthew Kilgore and Clem Kanhai, spoke of the timing issue, as the <br />applicant was wishing to go forward with the business operations, and requested that the Commission <br />grant a favorable recommendation for the signs as proposed at this time since they met all the code <br />and guideline requirements. <br /> <br />It was moved by Commissioner Andreae to send to the Public Works Director a recommendation for <br />approval of the sign permit application as submitted. Commissioner Burns reiterated her concern <br />about traffic safety, and suggested that a recommendation for a larger font be included. <br />2 <br /> <br />