My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-11-19 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2013
>
2013-11-19 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2014 7:54:33 AM
Creation date
1/22/2014 7:54:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Kitchens seconded the motion; he agreed about the traffic safety issue, but opined that <br />such a recommendation should be made in general rather than just for this particular case. A roll call <br />vote was taken, and the motion carried with five ayes (Andreae, Kitchens, Au Hoy, Burns and <br />Stanbro) and three absent and excused (Akina, Bleck and Broderson). <br /> <br /> <br />3.Design review of a sign permit application for a proposed ground directory sign for Hawaii <br />Electric Light Company. Applicant: Hawaii Electric Light Company. Land Owner: <br />Hawaii Electric Light Company. TMK: 7-4-010:022. Located at 74-5519 Kaiwi Street, <br />Kailua-Kona. <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Childs oriented the Commission of the subject property on recent photographs, and described the <br />proposed ground directory sign. He also described how the applicant was proposing to prepare the <br />area for the installation by relocating an existing chain-link fence and landscaping. He noted that the <br />proposed sign complied with the design guidelines of the Sign Code and the Master Plan for <br />Kailua-Kona. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Stanbro’s inquiry, Mr. Childs gave a report on the status of the <br />applicant’s landscaping project, which the Commission had previously reviewed and supported, with <br />some suggestions. He displayed photographs showing the progress, which he had taken earlier in the <br />day. <br /> <br />The applicant’s representative, Scott Fleming, provided additional information on the proposal. He <br />said that the groundcover to be planted in the signage area would be irrigated, and that the rock <br />material to be used for the sign would perfectly match that of the building behind since they were <br />from the same source. The Commissioners expressed their approval of the signage design, and also <br />thanked the applicant for following through the landscaping project according to the suggestions <br />made by the Commission. <br /> <br />It was moved by Commissioner Kitchens, and seconded by Commissioner Au Hoy, to send to the <br />Public Works Director a recommendation for approval of the sign permit application as submitted. <br />A roll call vote was taken and the motion carried with five ayes (Kitchens, Au Hoy, Andreae, Burns <br />and Stanbro) and three absent and excused (Akina, Bleck and Broderson). <br /> <br />4. Review and discussion of the Commission’s mission and priorities relating to the Kailua <br />Village Special District, including consideration of establishing committees or <br /> sub-committees to address particular interests of the Commission. <br /> <br /> <br />The Chair opened the discussion by referring back to the subject of variance procedure that <br />Commissioner Burns had brought up during Agenda Item No. 2. Commissioner Burns reiterated her <br />recommendation that variances from the signage area restriction code, which currently forced <br />businesses with a long name to reduce the size of lettering, and therefore created traffic safety <br />concerns, should be issued by the Public Works Director as administrative permits, rather than <br />legislatively by the County Council. She further said that while there had been an ongoing effort to <br />amend the Sign Code for the past few years, this section of the Code should be addressed separately <br />and immediately since it involved the safety of the public. She added that she as an engineer often <br />found herself in conflict with her expert knowledge of safety requirements for signage, when she had <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.