Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />She informed the commission that for rule making purposes, the commission would <br />have to hold public hearings, publish it and then submit for approval. Mr. Matsuda <br />noted that since the meetings were set for the first and third Thursdays, in order to <br />change that it, it would have to be the decision of the body. <br /> <br />Ms. Garson affirmed and noted the commission would have to give proper notice. <br /> <br />9. DISCUSSION/ACTION REGARDING APPROACH TO TAKE TO TIMELY <br />ACCOMPLISH MANDATE OF THE COST OF GOVERNMENT COMMISSION <br /> <br />Ms. Garson stated a report will need to be completed in 11 months pursuant to <br />the County Charter. <br /> <br />Ms. Maddox wondered if anything had been implemented from the previous <br />commission because she noted some carried over and if this commission’s time would <br />be better served looking in other areas to move more quickly. <br /> <br />Ms. Garson stated one of the first things the last Cost of Government <br />Commission did was send a letter to everyone. Two letters went out, one went to those <br />who had previous recommendations and ones that didn’t. She stated the commission <br />could do that again, send out letters to all department heads and boards and <br />commissions and ask them what was done with their previous recommendation and <br />respond by a certain date. <br /> <br />Ms. Maddox noted the letters looked good but it didn’t say what came back or <br />whether or not the recommendations were implemented. <br /> <br />Mr. Mitchell stated this is half of what the commission wants. <br /> <br />Ms. Kelly stated if the commission already has the answers, it would just be <br />copied. <br /> <br />Ms. Garson replied that it came from the last commission. <br /> <br />Ms. Maddox inquired that when the letters were sent out with what the <br />recommendations were, did the departments and boards and commissions respond and <br />share what they implemented or not? <br /> <br />Ms. Kierkiewicz stated essentially this commission wants to know if what the last <br />commission recommended was implemented. The departments could respond by a <br />certain date and the commission could schedule follow-up meetings to interview the <br />departments. <br /> <br />Ms. Garson stated that could be done now. She also said the commission could <br />decide how they would want the report done; the last commission outlined in their report <br />the procedure they followed and what they did. The letters can be sent out but the <br />commission has to authorize the Chairperson to sign those letters. <br /> <br />Ms. Maddox asked if the communication could be online. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />